Page 45 - Jack Danforth News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> i agree. and there is precedent for this, of course. leon jaworski, the special prosecutor during watergate, in the interests of public disclosure and transparency released the entire final report of the watergate prosecution. there was a previous appointment of a special counsel in the waco case. former senator jack danforth of missouri who released a complete and fulsome report with very few redactions of his investigation into the issues around the waco matter in texas. so i do think there is precedent for the full relates release of a report of this kind with very minimal redactions or ...

To release, and the fact that he's saying that he wants to consult and making it public that he wants to consult with robert mueller, that would strike me as one of the more encouraging notes people who want full disclosure are finding in that letter. >> i agree. and there is precedent for this, of course. leon jaworski, the special prosecutor during watergate, in the interests of public disclosure and transparency released the entire final report of the watergate prosecution. there was a previous appointment of a special counsel in the waco case. former senator jack danforth of missouri who r...

Of course. leon jaworski, the special prosecutor during watergate, in the interests of public disclosure and transparency released the entire final report of the watergate prosecution. there was a previous appointment of a special counsel in the waco case. former senator jack danforth of missouri who released a complete and fulsome report with very few redactions of his investigation into the issues around the waco matter in texas. so i do think there is precedent for the full relates release of a report of this kind with very minimal redactions or redactions in terms of what's released to the...

This grand document and finding this in it. it's not like this is like, you know, william rehnquist or jack danforth or someone finding this. this is a self-interested suspicious claim. i agree congressman schiff is right to say the justice department should really look at this because it's issued some generic guidance. it's not a precedent or anything. it's just some generic guidance saying sitting presidents in general shouldn't be indicted but i don't think it necessarily applies to this situation. >> why do these guidelines >> why does it seem like the guidelines exist in the first place? ...

Stop all this nonsense and start standing up and talking about what this country is about. >> yeah. neal, let me read some of it and get your reaction. this is part of their op-ed. they said regardless of party affiliation, ideological leanings or geography, as former members of this great body, we urge current and future senators to be steadfast and zealous guardians of our democracy by ensuring that partisanship or self-interest not replace national interest. can it be done given the extreme partisanship we see now? >> well, holy smocks, don. when i read that, tears actually came to my eyes ...