Page 2 - Johnson Call News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Comment on the discussions. but i can, i can give him assurance that of course neath the prime minister or then the secretary, nor any member of the this government. >> both the white house on downing street published brief notes on that conversation. neath made any mention of the investigation that trump is demanding. days after the trump johnson call, the attorney general william barr was in london for a meeting on tension cooperation. and moving trump's investigation forward. he says his british sources were shocked at the requests coming from washington. >> the way that it began to emerge,...

>> reporter: good morning, alisyn. it was going to be a busy day, but not. these are the four white house witnesses that were going to be testifying, all of them, citing reasons, executive privilege, defying subpoenas, saying they want their own white house attorneys. those individuals, robert blair, senior adviser to the acting chief of staff, mick mulvaney, john eisenberg, nsc top legal adviser, michael ellis, deputy legal adviser, and brian mccormack, the director of the office of management and budget. what is most significant is john eisenberg. he is the one that fiona hill, trump's top r...

But i can -- i can give him the assurance that, of course, neither the prime minister or as then was the foreign secretary, nor any member of this government, would collude in the way that he's described. >> reporter: both the white house and downing street published brief notes on that conversation. neither made any mention of the investigation that trump is demanding. days after the trump/johnson call, attorney general william barr was in london for a meeting on intelligence cooperation and moving trump's investigation forward. veteran uk diplomatic journalist kim san gupta says his british ...

Call, that nothing illegal happened. i was doing my job. why can't he stick with that? >> well, he's not going to have a lot of support for that. i think republicans, i think the reports in "the washington post" are true that the senators, republican senators are looking for a place where they can stand. where they're fine. and it's not that it didn't happen, because the depositions will prove that it did. and remember, they only turn the money over after they heard there was a whistle-blower complaint. >> right. and who are they going to believe? are they going to believe a president who is n...

And he said, not illegal. he just kept saying, not illegal, not illegal, not illegal. obviously, high crimes, which is -- this is a political process, not a legal process for impeachment. but high crimes is open to interpretation. >> yeah, no, it is a political question. and it is an open question whether this would be illegal and the person would be prosecuted, unless he's president. but we've been down this road before. the president won't be indicted under this justice department. i mean, this was, i think, where they were going eventually anyway. we've talked a little bit about this. yes, ...