Page 35 - Judicial Process News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

House of representatives as a high crime and misdemeanor for krrgs in an impeachment proceeding. if he behaves in an obstructionist behavior, just as with nixon and bill clinton lying under oath would deemed to be obstruction of justice, referred charged, sent to the senate, that can follow here with president trump. he may not be indictable. that's debatable. but i don't think that is depositive. >> david, let me give you a chance. i want to hear from you again. >> none of the statutory provisions apply here. but beyond that, as a constitutional matter -- i'm not saying that the president can...

>> executive privilege is a legal relative of patient, doctor, and lawyer, client. relationships are so important and communication people have in those relationships so important and we want it to flow as freely as possible, so we're going to give it a special cone of confidentiality and privacy. so when the president asserts executive privilege, there's a special constitutional dimension to it. the president as chief executive is tasked with executing laws and the claim would go president trump is the next in a long line of presidents to make this kind of plan, that the job of the president ...

Tests for judges. i've written about that years ago. i wasn't about to become party to such a thing. i'm here to report that you should become reassured because no one in the process from the time i was contacted with an expression interview for a potential interview, no one in the process asked me for any commitments, any promises for how i'd rule in any kind of case. >> and that's how it should be. we just discussed your independence from the president but there's also independence from the legislative branch. it's odd some of the same folks who will claim you're not independent from the pre...

Think of his fierce independence, and he said i have a job, and people asked what his judicial philosophy was, and i give the same answer. i decide cases. it's a pretty good philosophy for a judge. i listen to the arguments made, and i read the briefs that are put to me. i listen to my colleagues carefully, and i listen to the lawyers in the well, and this experience has reminded me what it's like to be a lawyer in the well. it's a lot easier to ask the questions, i find, as a judge, than to have all the answers as the lawyer in the well. so i take the process, the judicial process very seriou...

Independence. he did his -- he said i have a job. people asked him what his judicial philosophy was. i'll give the same answer. i decide cases. it's a pretty good philosophy for a judge. i listen to the arguments made, i read the briefs put to me, i listen to my colleagues carefully and i listen to the lawyers in the well. this experience reminded me what it's like to be a lawyer in the well. it's a lot easier to ask the questions, i find as a judge, than it is to have the answers as the lawyer in the well. i take the process, the judicial process very seriously. i go through it step by step a...