Page 11 - Judiciary Process News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> not about this. >> excuse me, he was grilled for 30 hours. >> not about this. >> i know your friends on the democratic side -- now they're going backwards. >> personal insults of me, nobody caress about this. just speak to this. >> this mans denies being there. do you think this process matters to judge kavanaugh and his wife and two daughters? >> i think it would be more fair to enlist the fbi. i think you're hurting your guy. >> we're not hurting our guy. >> you are. because it looks like you're hiding him from scrutiny. >> who is hiding? he's ready to testify. >> why won't you have the f...

Encourage that kind of behavior and i don't think you do. >> but regardless of the process, and even if it was a delay the problem with the delay argument is delay of what? there is no hard time of what this means. >> no, there is delay for the purpose of pushing it beyond the mid-terms. that is the perceived goal. >> but there's no reason for it to get to that point. with anita hill you have precedent. the fbi looked into it three days, you have precedent, you set the time. but at least you show you checked the boxes and shame on the democrats how you handled the letter. >> if you could do th...

First time, he was willing to testify and cleared his name and say under oath what he has said otherwise, which is unequivocally and categorically this is not true. so he was willing to do it last monday. she's not willing to do it the following monday. we have said from the very beginning that they both should be heard and that the process, because we respect the process, the senate judiciary process and the senate's process. they are charged constitutionally with advising and consenting to the president on supreme court nominations. and you need to -- if you're going to be always looking for...

The least possible sensitivity 27 years ago. >> tarana, what is your message to lawmakers on the judiciary committee? do you have any sense that the line of questioning, the tone of it, would be different this time? >> it has to be different. my message would be that you have to learn lessons from 27 years ago. we can't relive anita hill. also, you can't approach this the way you approach any other, you know, judiciary process. you're talking about questioning a person who survived sexual violence, held it in for so many years and under pressure forced to come forward. this has to be handled g...

Don't want to do this, i'm anonymous, use it for what it's worth. >> and her friend posted on facebook, and had to retract it. now people want me to go on tv and back it up. i didn't mean what i said. she's not helpful. >> she will be her own advocate here, she'll have to. here's my concern. this is a struggle, this is hard, we don't have standards, we don't have rules, we don't know how to judge these situations -- >> there is a process in the senate judiciary -- >> not to judge this -- >> the senate has hosted sincetive witnesses in the past, who also had threats to their safety. >> it's not...