Kill Assad News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

According to very good reporting, we've got the military saying no or ignoring his orders to go kill assad. we have the military saying no or ignoring his orders to create a preemptive military strike plan for north korea. we have the military saying no or ignoring his orders when he wanted a war plan for iran. we've got the military saying noer 0 ignoring his orders when it came to him announcing 0 not twitter he was banning transgender people from serving. they were like, sure, sure, sir, we'll get back to you on that. it's comforting in a way if you don't want the country to have done those...

This seems to justify immediate congressional hearings to find out who they were. i would haul up every single cabinet secretary. you have to protect an anonymous source, but i would haul up political appointees from every agency to talk about who talked about invoking the 25th amendment and what did you see. if as bob woodward reports, they wanted -- the president wanted to assassinate assad, mattis had to explain he was protecting the country from world war 3. we have a more serious problem than right/left polarization. >> ma konicolle, it will not ha with this majority in congress. there is...

Assad, sb 6 points out, was in damascus, and at the airport, and he still has the capability to do it. again, i asked jennifer griffin yesterday, what is the administration's purpose or the military's purpose here? is it to kill assad? and she specifically said, not only not kill assad but not even regime change. >> killing assad would be illegal. you cannot kill another world leader. even if you really want to. no one is ever going to say that. >> but the russians say but we did was an attack on a -- >> if not kill assad, then what? >> maybe first of all, don't use that gas again, number one,...

I think they probably will, but so far. >> they haven't lined up. >> they're holding back, eric, there could be good reason. the reuters poll that was taken august 30 to september 3, the question is should the u.s. intervene in syria, and 56% of people said no. >> not surprising. also a little on the breaking news, not sure if we have time to get to it, the saudis and other arab and oil producing nations say they'll finance the attack. i mention yesterday, why wouldn't they. they came forth today, told kerry they would do that. this is ridiculous. what does that make us, they will pay us to at...

Don't sound like it is a conspiracy to deceive the american people or seer yans, sounds like they're going after assad, regime change off the table, which is nuts. i wouldn't mind a three day attack if directed to kill assad and his inner circle. this is a dictator that doesn't care about civilian losses, doesn't care about his own troop losses. he cares about his own life. he is a sociopath. the rule is to teach people not to use chemical weapons, maybe one way to do it is kill people that give the order. >> we have three panels. more on syria coming up, how close is the u.s. to military acti...