Page 3 - Kill Michael Brown News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

What's not appealing is a politician who's so anxious to be in the political game that he's willing to try to skirt the law and get it changed. that's very unappealing. so the glow is now coming off rand paul as he seems like just another politician. and that's a very, very bad thing. >> a republican debate stage without a member of the paul family just isn't right. thank you both very much for joining me tonight. coming up, ray rice talks about his suspension and about what he didn't say at that press conference in may when he appeared with his wife. and in the rewrite, what you have to do ...

Washington post" being lazy or willful in hiding the int consistencies? witness number 10's statement? well, the editing of the quoted testimony is certainly willful. and we all do that. whenever we use quotations, we have to decide where to begin the quotations and where to end the quotations. the article offers this quote from witness number 10's testimony about a gesture that michael brown made. he, mike brown, stopped. he did turn, he did some sort of body gesture. i'm not sure what it was. but i know it was a body gesture, and i could say for sure he never put his hands up after he did hi...

Michael broup. what that headline proves is that t"the washington post" website headline writers don't know what proof is. the article includes a few carefully edited statements that witness number 10 made to the grand jury but not one word of what witness number 10 said to the police just two days after the shooting. instead of quoting what witness number 10 told the police, the article simply offers this completely false statement. witness number 10's later grand jury testimony is consistent with the statement he gave police just 48 hours after the shooting. now, in order to get away with th...

It 50 to 75 yards. he just cut the distance in half to the grand jury. cut the distance in half. under oath to that grand jury. 100 yards became 50 yards, just like that. this is the most inconvenient fact that "the washington post" article could possibly be forced to acknowledge in its factually incorrect story that aims to prove that darren wilson did, indeed, have to kill michael brown. and so the article simply left that inconvenient fact out. the most important fact about an eyewitness, how far away. and the article didn't just leave that witness, number 10, didn't just leave them 100 yar...