Page 3 - Led Mueller News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Some extent, certain aspects of obstruction, not those by the president, but those of witnesses who refuse to speak truthfully to the investigators, who destroyed texts and other important evidence, that the investigation might have needed, that led mueller to conclude in his report that their investigation was materially impaired. that's if the house judiciary committee can do that much, they will have done a great deal and a great service already. the intelligence committee's responsibility is to examine how much of a threat this was to the security of u.s. elections in 2016 and critically h...

There was no obstruction and none whatsoever. and it was a complete and total exoneration. >> that was our president. that's what led mueller to write about the public confusion that was being let loose. effective that moment. as we've been reporting, the report did not declare total exoneration. you submit to tyranny when you renounce the difference between what you want to hear and what is actually the case. we welcome back to the broadcast timothy snyder. professor snyder was educated in the ivy league and at oxford specializing on europe and the holocaust. he happens to be the author of tw...

And it was a complete and total exoneration. >> that was our president the day the attorney general released that four-page summary letter. that's what led mueller to write about the public confusion that was being let loose effective that moment. of course, as we've been reporting, the report did not declare total exoneration. our next guest writes in his book "on tyranny and we quote," you submit to tyranny when you renounce the difference between what you want to hear and what is actually the case. and so we welcome back to the broadcast timothy snyder, yale university professor, professor ...

Heard. no obstruction. none whatsoever. it was a complete and total exoneration. >> that was our president the day the attorney general released that four-page summary letter. that's what led mueller to write that tyranny when you renounce the difference between what you want to hear and what is actually the we welcome back timothy snyder. he was a marshall scholar. he happens to be the author of two books in this area. the first we just mentioned on tyranny. 20 lessons from the 20th

Democrats. chairman adam schiff explains. >> i don't think the special counsel's office would characterize it as a friendly subpoena. he did not want to testify. he made that very clear. nonetheless, they will respect the subpoena. he will appear. griff: both democrats and republicans are looking forward to the chance to question the former special counsel. democrats will be zeroing in on what led mueller to his conclusion on no collusion and apparent confusion on obstructions. judiciary committee chairman jerry nadler had this to say. >> our interest is for the american people to hear it from...