Page 9 - Majority Staff News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Turn this information over to the trump legal team. chairman nunes, one of the gang of eight. >> he's the chairman of the house intelligence committee. >> that's right. i think was working hand in glove with the white house during the entire russia investigation. >> what are you alleging? what is he going to do? >> i think what he's done all along. he went along with the white house gag order. >> do you share mike's concerns? >> absolutely, don. there were so many times when witnesses would come in and their lawyers would tell us, oh, we were told by the republican majority staff we wouldn't h...

Recommendations, most of the three he cited, one of them pertained to me, which i thought in the relative scheme of things pretty inconsequential. so i don't know why he did it. secondly, i don't know what they were talking about. my attorney reached out to the majority staff of the house intelligence committee to ask for some ex-plaplanation, and y pashtsly tpasht apparently they have to submit the report to intelligence committee to have it declassified which of course could take weeks, so i don't know when i'll find out about it, but it kind of blindsided me. they didn't reach out to me to ...

The trump supporters will point to -- maybe it was jim this mentioned this, perhaps it was manu, that steele, according to, again, this political document from the majority staff and the house intelligence committee, that steele was talking to michael izakopf of yahoo news before the fisa application and that he should have been already fired at the time of the first application for fisa. you see some republican commentary, but you are going to see a lot of trump supporters and perhaps republicans more broadly to start using this to rally around the notion that too much has been made of this. ...

And obviously issuing a blanket executive privilege claim over stuff that really, you know, shouldn't even be a problem answering, i can understand it if it's something that's really a problem. but if it's just a general blanket thing that's obviously not cooperation. >> did you pick up on that detail, rick, from adam schiff that the majority had been informed by bannon's counsel that this was going to happen but not the democrats? >> yeah. again, that doesn't necessarily surprise me. the majority gets herr heads-up if you're chair of the committee before the minority does -- >> why should we ...

Sometimes the majority gets the heads up if you're chairing the committee before the minority does. >> why should we have confidence in what they're doing if that's the kind of politics that's being played within the committee? >> i don't think that's necessarily true. the white house or any would contact the majority staff and let them know that and it would be up to the majority staff to be able to communicate that. >> they didn't. >> i don't think that's a white house problem. >> no, no. i'm not suggesting it is. i'm saying it's within the question committee but it winds up being partisan j...