Page 45 - Mark Corallo News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Other witnesses and attorneys representing other witnesses that have been investigated. one of them that we know more about than others because of the divide among two former trump staffers is that crafting of a statement aboard air force one to try to explain away the purpose and what had happened in the meeting with the president's son, donald trump, jr., his son-in-law, jared kushner, and the russians who, i don't know if it's fair to say lured them there, but got them there by promising dirt on hillary clinton. we've known from mark corallo, a one-time member of the president's legal team,...

And his wife, who represents mark corallo, a one-time spokesperson for the president's legal team, who walked out the door, said he would have nothing to do with the team after he thought there was a directive from hope hicks and perhaps higher up to lie, to craft a statement aboard air force one that amounted to a lie about don jr.'s meetings with russians. and i ask you this because carol's reporting brings the obstruction of justice case back into the spotlight. we talk alternatively about the collusion case and the obstruction of justice case. watching that clip with joe dejenna voe, we kn...

Ultimately kick this to the political process. the other branch of government to handle. because the justice department, again, under this legal finding, is not able to prosecute a sitting president. >> chuck rosenberg, let me ask you about that sound that we played at the top of the show. that was joe digenova. he was a candidate to be added to the president's legal team about the time that if you sort of wind back the clock based on carol and robert acosta's reporting, it would be about the time john dowd would have informed the president he learned from the special counsel that he was a sub...

To do with the team after he thought there was a directive from hope hicks and perhaps higher up to lie, to craft a statement aboard air force one that amounted to a lie about don jr.'s meetings with russians. and i ask you this because carol's reporting brings the obstruction of justice case back into the spotlight. we talk alternatively about the collusion case and the obstruction of justice case. watching that clip with joe digenova, we know what kind of approach he would have taken. if you could speak to the president being a subject and the president not able to be represented by someone ...

Opposing interests or opposing views in the same matter. if they're representing mark corallo, and they appear to be and mark turns out to be a witness against the president, then digenova should not also be representing the president. he's getting information from two people that would be contradictory and conflicting. and so clear conflict. i think it makes good sense that mr. digenova is not in the case anymore based on what i heard him say in that clip. it seems like the type of attorney that the president might like to have on his side. that said, he can't. it's a conflict, and he has to ...