Page 3 - Material Omissions News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The information that is available. you cannot make material omissions. that is an important distinction and an important difference. >> shannon: which of these things do you think would be most helpful? the democrats memo, the underlying fisa applications, the documents underlying the house intelligence memo -- some of this has to be classified material that we can't get. what do you think we can get and what you think will be most helpful to the whole picture? >> a mostly unredacted democratic memo, it will suffer from some of the same defects we have seen in the grassley memo and the nunes m...

The information that is available. you cannot make material omissions. that is an important distinction and an important difference. >> shannon: which of these things do you think would be most helpful? the democrats memo, the underlying fisa applications, the documents underlying the house intelligence memo -- some of this has to be classified material that we can't get. what do you think we can get and what you think will be most helpful to the whole picture? >> a mostly unredacted democratic memo, it will suffer from some of the same defects we have seen in the grassley memo and the nunes m...

Totally vindicates trump. keeping him honest, whatever else you might think of the nunes document, whether you believe as the fbi does that it contains, quote, material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo's accuracy, one thing is plain just from reading it. the memo does not exonerate or vindicate anyone, let alone president trump. it largely deals with applications for fisa surveillance court warrants targeting carter page, the one-time foreign policy adviser to the trump campaign. the memo alleges deputy fbi director andrew mccabe told the house intelligence committee that n...

News article was sufficient and a dossier is all that was used? the material omissions are everything. what else was used to support and substantiate? it may well be that there are lapses in judgment or there are huge areas that were not investigated or vetted. that would belie the entire process of going through a fisa court and a fisa warrant. it has to be a full investigation. it's not based on one or two documents but the compilation of context and vetted information and a lot of accurate facts that are there. to suggest we should discredit one organization or agency because they leave key...

Or at least under surveillance. you know, we had been promised a bombshell that was going to make watergate look like a parking ticket. there really wasn't anything there along those lines. when i reached the final page, i kept thinking maybe i hadn't printed out all of the pages. >> you said there's context missing. give us some examples. >> they fundamentally are undermining it. they're saying you have to discredit any investigation. there's a material misleading of fact. it doesn't -- it leaves out whether or not there was anything else, anything at all that would be considered by an articl...