Page 30 - May 2016 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Meanwhile, democrats could not care less about the government accountability. instead they are on the mission to read personal e-mail and text of ivanka trump and jared kushner. joining us with more is catherine herridge. >> jason, based on the reporting, the investigation into the investigators led by the u.s. attorney john durham is considering whether key evidence was withheld from the national security fisa court including transcripts that showed a trump campaign aide was against working with the russians. during this week's testimony, former special counsel robert mueller was peppered wit...

Mission to read personal e-mail and text of ivanka trump and jared kushner. joining us with more is catherine herridge. >> jason, based on the reporting, the investigation into the investigators led by the u.s. attorney john durham is considering whether key evidence was withheld from the national security fisa court including transcripts that showed a trump campaign aide was against working with the russians. during this week's testimony former special counsel robert mueller was peppered with questions about campaign aide george papadopoulos. and the may 2016 meeting with the australian ambas...

Make a charging decision after your investigation where unless there was enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt you wouldn't make a charge, correct? >> generally that's the case. >> but making that decision does not mean your investigation failed to turn up evidence of conspiracy. >> absolutely correct. >> and, in fact, i'll go through some of the significant findings that your exhaustive investigation made. you found, as i understand it, that from may 2016 until the end of the campaign, campaign chairman mr. manafort gave private polling information to russian agents, correct? >> ...

Investigation where unless there was enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt you wouldn't make a charge, correct? >> making that decision godoes t mean your investigation failed to turn up evidence of conspiracy? >> that's correct. >> i'll go through some of the significant findings that your exhaustive investigation made. you found as i understand it, that from may 2016 until the end of the campaign. campaign chairman mr. manafort gave private polling information to russian agents, correct? >> correct. >> can you speak into the microphone? >> yes, i will. my apologize. >> in june 2...

Decision after your investigation where, unless there was enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, you wouldn't make a charge, correct? >> generally, that's the case. >> but making that decision does not mean your investigation failed to turn up evidence of conspiracy? >> that's correct. >> and, in fact, i will go through some of the significant findings that your exhaustive investigation made. you found, if >> mr. welsh. you found from may 2016, mr. manafort gave private polling portion. >> can you speak into the microphone? >> i will. my apologies. >> thank you. your investigation...