Michael Breed News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

these members voted against bills they actually support. it is the same cast of characters from january who tried to derail the speaker. what point are they trying to make if any, let's find out, joining a speaker of the house, kevin mccarthy from the great state of california, thank you for joining us mr. speaker, the first question why are the members voting with democrats to keep gop bills from coming up from about. they haven't spelled out what they want. you know this better than anyone we miss you serving with us in congress. the republicans only control the house by five votes...

these members voted against bills they actually support. it is the same cast of characters from january who tried to derail the speaker. what point are they trying to make if any, let's find out, joining a speaker of the house, kevin mccarthy from the great state of california, thank you for joining us mr. speaker, the first question why are the members voting with democrats to keep gop bills from coming up from about. they haven't spelled out what they want. you know this better than anyone we miss you serving with us in congress. the republicans only control the house by five votes...

members voted against bills they support, same cast from january, who tried to derail the speaker. what point are they trying to make, if any? let's find out. joining us is speaker of the house, kevin mccarthy, from the great state of california. thank you for joining us, mr. speaker. why? why are these members voting with democrats to keep gop bills from coming up for a vote? >> speaker mccarthy: i'm not sure. trey, we missed you serving with us in congress. republicans control the house by five votes, democrats control senate and white house. less than 5% of members voted with demo...

it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn't want the affidavit released even with redact shawredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash p patel's name un-- kash patel's name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dpeum documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump's indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal media personalties ...

it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn't want the affidavit released even with redact shawredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash p patel's name un-- kash patel's name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dpeum documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump's indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal media personalties ...