Page 2 - Mind Set Is News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

I myself was on the receiving end of what i felt to be somewhat inappropriate phone calls from him after he would give speeches and say hey, how do you think i did? did you like the speech? something told me he knew that was inappropriate, and that's why he did it. he knows he is making his targets feel uncomfortable, and he brushes it off to just being friendly and good-natured, but in the case of speaking with or conveying messages to a special prosecutor, i find it difficult to believe that there is anybody in the white house, anybody in the white house counsel's office who told the preside...

General omitted from his letter. in trying to describe the fair trial edward would receive would be the right to confront the witnesses or the evidence against him. no secret evidence. he didn't mention that, the right that edward would have to summon witnesses in his favor. no mention of that, the presumption of innocence, no mention of that. why? these seem glaring. we know the government would try to claim classification, national security secrets, we can't disclose this to the defendant. >> when you see the way bradley manning was treated early on, do you believe your son would be basicall...

The witnesses or the evidence against him. no secret evidence. he didn't mention that, the right that edward would have to summon witnesses in his favor. no mention of that, the presumption of innocence, no mention of that. why? these seem glaring. we know the government would try to claim classification, national security secrets, we can't disclose this to the defendant. >> when you see the way bradley manning was treated early on, do you believe your son would be basically helping those -- held no in those same conditions? >> no, i think because that was so embarrassing to our government and...