Page 3 - Nano Second News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

This is about moving the ball forward. >> i'm moving the ball forward. >> i don't want to argue with you about it. >> we offered. we offered them. we made an offer $2.9 billion just layout -- we layed out several protections. several protections. please, ask secretary azar and ask my republican colleagues why they don't want to protect these kids. they can have the money in a nano second. just give us protection of these kids. while they are -- >> i'm going to tell you what i'm being told without violating any confidences. let's see if we can figure out where the caps are. that's more importan...

They ground it to a halt. >> they need money for it. >> let's do it but let's guarantee that in those accommodations when you go to an unlicensed facility -- >> i know what's going to happen. >> but let's do this. i'm not just about tv. this is about moving the ball forward. >> i'm moving the ball forward. >> i don't want to argue with you about it. >> we offered. we offered them. we made an offer $2.9 billion just layout -- we layed out several protections. several protections. please, ask secretary azar and ask my republican colleagues why they don't want to protect these kids. they can have...

Neil: it's weird, these are two liberals, but very different views how far you go on some liberal issues. jeff bezos never once responded to criticisms from donald trump, but he didn't waste a nano second from criticism of bernie marcus-- not bernie marcus. >> because he doesn't like being attacked from the left that way. it's interesting, when you look at what bernie is saying, and the ability to do this, although they'll do it next week. neil: attacks on companies that don't in their view pay people enough because they have to rely on government benefits. >> like food stamps. this is interes...

With high stakes, high profile trial. >> it is hard to say in general, but what you would do, if you were concerned if one side was going too slowly or concerned about the scope of the evidence, what you would do is wait until the jury leaves the room and then admonish one side or the other. what you don't do is do this in front of the jury. but let me put the shoe on the other foot. i have no doubt and this is for after my years as a lawyer and my years as a judge. that if the defense was the focus of these kinds of comments they would be moved for a mistrial in a nano second. you avoid that ...

But what you would do, if you were concerned if one side was going too slowly or concerned about the scope of the evidence, what you would do is wait until the jury leaves the room and then admonish one side or the other. what you don't do is do this in front of the jury. but let me put the shoe on the other foot. i have no doubt and this is for after my years as a lawyer and my years as a judge. that if the defense was the focus of these kinds of comments they would be moved for a mistrial in a nano second. you avoid that by making comments if you have to and have to control the proceeding ou...