Page 2 - Nasdaq Bubble News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Worm Capital commentary for the first quarter ended March 31, 2022. As we’ve often said in previous letters, we couldn’t be more excited about the current business environment.

A post-pandemic bubble in certain assets is only one thing the market and investors must work through right now....ZM

>> i think i'm more muted than that. >> yeah. >> i think there will be a reasonable trudging along as we have done for the last number of years. >> man. >> i do believe as much as i said, the investment more rihor it's not impacting investors today. that situation will change. i don't want want to minimize that the dysfunction in washington has to change. it's a cliff will hit, wall we'll hit, we're not sure when, and it will come in an unexpected way. >> you know, mika, i think both of the guys would agree with me here. we continue -- we're in a period right now of deleveraging, and this is d...

That's a little too simple. >> i brought up last night, jeffrey, you know, from january 2009, you and i were concerned about the stimulus package. not even the size as much as the targeting. we said that in realtime -- >> and the lack of targeting and six weeks you're going to spend nearly $1 trillion and know what you're doing. >> we also said it was going to create a bubble. what i thought was so fascinating and he was offended by me bringing up the quote, but, you know, back in 2002 -- 2001 and 2002, but he wrote it in an op ed in 2002. he said we need a housing bubble to replace the nasdaq...

Happen. >> what do you mean all kinds of things? paul, again, you've been predicting this for 20 years. that's such a tired argument, to search for quotes i said in stuff once upon a time. >> once upon a time? you said this for 15 years, then woke up one day and said i was wrong. you said we needed to create a housing bubble to replace a nasdaq bubble. >> you know i was joking when i said that. >> you were joking? >> this is so disa poinppoindis? >> i'm quoting back what you are saying. i don't think -- >> we need a serious discussion here. >> what is the attack? >> what is it in the next ten ...