Live Breaking News & Updates on Noncorruption Kind
Stay updated with breaking news from Noncorruption kind. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Activity but you know, the justice department has tools to hold accountable people who violate laws against electronic surveillance of unauthorized targets. you know, and i just want to very narrowly focus with you on, dan, on something jeremy s saying. i mean, in a noncorruption style probe, there is not any known precedent for subpoenaing through apple the phone and email metadata of a sitting member of congress, especially as he s saying from the other party and at this point, we don t know of anybody in the republican party who had their records subpoenaed from apple. you worked for congressman schiff, and you and sort of the impeachment team were on the receiving end of those barbs. what is your theory? what are your sort of first reactions to what we know at this juncture? well, they re a combination of things that lead me to believe that this is, perhaps, the most serious and egregious ....
Emails and about this what is described as extremely aggressive tactic for a noncorruption kind of investigation of subpoenaing the records of sitting members of congress, their staff and children? so there s no question that to subpoena this kind of information you would need extensive factual pred case and you would brief this to the highest levels in the fbi and the justice department. my educated guess about what s going on here is the reason we re seeing this, i suspect will see more of this, is because these gag orders are running out and that the current justice department is not willing to stand behind them when they re not warranted. to me that s a sign as we saw last week with respect to going after reporters, as mike just mentioned where gag orders were ....
Hasn t been the best managed administration that we ve seen come down the pike in a while, although the president really is proud of his record of noncorruption which this, you know, kind of destroys. wow. but i do believe he s not connected to it personally, at least. i do believe that in the end the big issue here isn t going to be the mistake and the stupidity of the mid-level employees who launched this, but it s going to be how much did the white house know and when did it know it? was this scandal, you know, submerged for electoral purposes in 2011/2012? right. that s what joe said, i think joe may have used the word over the weekend, nixonian. yeah. and rightly so. but what joe s right. the test of whether it truly is nixonian is yet to be seen. what we know about the white house. let me tell you one other thing, chris. i was just duown in kentucky ovr the weekend where mitch mcconnell is running for ....
About what anybody thinks about him. he doesn t play the game. i m wondering, will jimmy carter get his team when people look back and say, camp david, and energy policy, helping america recover from the scars of watergate? i think the vision that he had for where our country should go, one of the things you measure a president by, is where does he want to take the ship of state. and in terms of energy and in terms of the post-watergate, noncorruption he did have a good vision. the question was, you got to be able to bring congress and the people with you to the port where you want to go. and he just didn t have those political skills. i don t think he was relaxed around congressmen. i remember tip o neill once said that he had seen ronald reagan more in the first six months of reagan s term than he had seen jimmy carter in the whole four years. i think if they have a post-presidency, when a biographer write the about them it does shadow in a positive way how they think athe life and ....
Dealings with and this morning we re learning that the united states government may be behind closed doors meeting with these individuals and brokering partnerships. aren t these bums supposed to be thrown out? well, the problem for the united states, you can if you throw the bums out, who do you put in. the only entity with noncorruption in afghanistan is the taliban. i think the more important thing is though, who cares about the corruption in afghanistan? one would think that we re fighting a war to kill our enemies and that s where our efforts should be, should be put. but then who are the enemies there? because this morning, even, reading the cover story inside corruptastan. why are we making deals inside the karzai, perhaps we should be making deals in the taliban, they perhaps are less corrupt. what question is the right to ask in this situation? the right question is what is in the interest of the ....