Stay updated with breaking news from Note Policy. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The central bank defended its decision on a PIL filed by petitioner lawyer Rajneesh Bhaskar Gupta challenging RBI's decision. The PIL argued that it lacks the independent authority, as per the RBI Act, to make such a decision.Appe
The central bank defended its decision on a PIL filed by petitioner lawyer Rajneesh Bhaskar Gupta challenging RBI's decision. The PIL argued that it lacks the independent authority, as per the RBI Act, to make such a decision.Appe
The central bank defended its decision on a PIL filed by petitioner lawyer Rajneesh Bhaskar Gupta challenging RBI's decision. The PIL argued that it lacks the independent authority, as per the RBI Act, to make such a decision.Appe
New Delhi, May 24 (IANS) A fresh Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Delhi High Court challenging the recent decision of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to withdraw Rs 2,000 notes from circulation.
New Delhi: A fresh Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Delhi High Court challenging the recent decision of the Reserve Bank of India