Live Breaking News & Updates on Nullity modulo

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Nullity modulo on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Nullity modulo and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Morning Joe

been scheduled for next wednesday, a week from tomorrow, september 6th. they're set to begin at 9:30 a.m. and run at 15-minute intervals. there's no word yet on whether those arraignments will be in-person or virtual. some kind of speed dating there, just getting them through, 15 minutes at a time, lisa rubin, to get them arraigned. let's go back to mark meadows. does he have a case that this should be moved to a federal court? >> he has more than a frivolous case but, i think ultimately, an un unsuccessful one. he was asked, "is there anything the president could have asked you to do that would have been beyond duties as white house chief of staff?" the only thing he came up with was trump asking him to speak at the rally. it is not that matter of law that speaking at a rally is the only thing he could do that would go beyond his federal duties. if it were, the hatch act would be a nullity. it's not whether or not he should be prosecuted for

Kind , Word , Arraignments , Speed-dating , September-6th , 30 , 15 , 9 , 6 , Plus-the-civil-case , Mark-meadows , Lisa-rubin

The Journal Editorial Report

they are financially worse off even though they may have benefited from the pause and the loan forgiveness. paul: the big question, if this is such a great policy why don't democrats try to pass it through congress, force republicans to vote for it and use it as an election issue? >> it is an election issue. that's precisely it. so many things democrats, progressives want to do that they can't get through congress through house of representatives which represents people all over the united states because it isn't popular enough to path so they are doing so many things through executive order through regulatory fiat. that has become the democratic game plan. get control of the white house and order the country to do these things. you want to sue them, fine but they put regulations in place and plans like this, congress basically becomes a nullity. paul: when we come back, hit

Paul , Policy-why-don-t-democrats , The-big-question , Pause , Loan-forgiveness , Democrat , Things , Republican , Election , Election-issue , Progressives , Congress

The Journal Editorial Report

forget, just pour it on through there, and the progressives in the white house are pushing -- this is the elizabeth warren of the presidency, basically reduce congress to a nullity. paul: right. >> the second aspect, this explains why the progressives are attacking the supreme court or why they want to attack the supreme court. they need a supreme court that would rubber stamp all these regulatory initiatives instead of the one that they have now which is inclined to push back against things as they did with biden's student debt plan. so this really is where the progressives want to take the country. it reduces congress to nothing, but i think as long as the supreme court is sitting there, we are going to have some of these regulatory emissions become major policy questions that go before the supreme court. paul: kate, on this question that dan raised about congress being a nullity, is that -- what can congress do? i know it has the review act

Paul-gigot , Congress , White-house , Progressives , Presidency , Elizabeth-warren , Nullity , Aspect , One , Ripe-for-a-supreme-court , Things , Supreme-court

FOX and Friends

there have been hold-outs on the republican side in the house and you are one in the senate. you say it doesn't go far enough. no, it doesn't go far enough, if it did what its lead advocates did, i would be pleased to vote for it. case after case, the cuts won't materialize. regulatory reform was important to me and they inserted the rains acts, they replaced that with regulatory pay-go to offset cost of new regulations. that is rendered fake. one amendment i will be pushing today would strike section 265 of the bill and rendering complete nullity to offset cost

House , Senate , Doesn-t-go , Side , Hold-outs , One , Case , Reform , Lead , Cuts , Advocates , Cost

BBC News-20220109-17:13:00

jurisdictional error. all that remains is that the decision is quashed. so, whether the court will make that decision tomorrow is another story because there are a lot of matters to consider. at the end of the day, the court willjust say this is a nullity. what is interesting is the response from the minister which hasjust interesting is the response from the minister which has just come through now, which shows an extraordinary doubling down, i guess, and makes it very clear that the minister of current affairs doesn't want novak djokovic in the country.— djokovic in the country. from your persoective. _ djokovic in the country. from your persoective. is — djokovic in the country. from your perspective, is that _ djokovic in the country. from your perspective, is that a _ djokovic in the country. from your perspective, is that a political- perspective, is that a political stance? that's about saying we've all had such privations in this country, we can't have someone come in apparentlyjust because they are famous or high profile or particularly important to a certain tournament. i particularly important to a certain tournament-— tournament. i don't think it is a olitical tournament. i don't think it is a political stance. _ tournament. i don't think it is a political stance. it _ tournament. i don't think it is a political stance. it is _ tournament. i don't think it is a political stance. it is a - tournament. i don't think it is a political stance. it is a legal - political stance. it is a legal argument which is basically saying what his lawyers are trying to do is

Decision , Federal-court , Story , Lot , All-that-remains , Error , Matters , Willjust , Doesnt-want-novak-djokovic , Minister , Response , Interesting

BBC News-20220109-18:12:00

the court can't grant him an interim visa to play in the australian open. the submissions novak djokovic's team have made i would say have some merit, and i think there is a reasonable chance the court might find there is a jurisdictional error. all that remains is that the decision is quashed. so, whether the court will make that decision tomorrow is another story because there are a lot of matters to consider. at the end of the day, the court will just say this is a nullity. what is interesting is the response from the minister which has just come through now, which shows an extraordinary doubling down, i guess, and makes it very clear that the minister of current affairs doesn't want novak djokovic in the country. from your perspective, is that a political stance? that's about saying we've all had such privations in this country, we can't have someone come in apparentlyjust because they are famous or high profile or particularly important to a certain tournament. i don't think it is a political stance. it is a legal argument which is basically saying what his lawyers are trying to do is inadmissible a have another go at the case. that's not what it is about. the decisions by the minister's lawyers... they are quite dismissive

Doesnt-want-novak-djokovic , Decision , Court , Chance , Submissions , All-that-remains , Team , Visa , Error , Merit , Australian-open , Minister

BBC News-20220109-14:19:00

solely to look at whether the border force officer at the airport made a legal error. and really it is the officer who was on trial here. we are unlikely to see mr djokovic take the stand as a witness. the court can't grant him an interim visa to play in the australian open. the submissions that his lawyers have made i would say have some merit, and i think there is a reasonable chance that the court might actually find that there is a jurisdictional error. all that means is that the decision is quashed, so whether the court will make that decision tomorrow is another story, because obviously there are a lot of factors to consider. but the end of the day, the court can't give him his visa back, it can only say it is a nullity. and the response to the minister which has come through now shows an extraordinary doubling down on this, and it makes it very clear that the ministerfor on this, and it makes it very clear that the minister for home affairs does not want mr djokovic in the

Djokovic , Court , Kabul-airport , Officer , Error , Stand , Border-force-officer , Trial , Witness , Visa , Lawyers , Submissions

BBC News-20220215-17:10:00

of abuse. and it also says we know thatjeffrey epstein trafficked countless girls. so this is a couple things, is saying this happened, i accept that this happened, jeffrey epstein did this and i was associated with him. it then goes on to say prince andrew regrets his association with jeffrey to say prince andrew regrets his association withjeffrey epstein. it is not an admission of guilt but it is not an admission of guilt but it is not an admission of guilt but it is not something i would expect to see in an out—of—court is not something i would expect to see this. out—of—court is not something i would expect to see this. it it—of—court is not something i would expect to see this. it is of—court is not something i would expect to see this. it is somewhere in like this. it is somewhere in between, i think. and in some ways you can see that that wording, because virginia giuffre had always said it's about accountability for her. there is some degree of account of nullity and the settlement. terms of reputation, it's fair to say that terms of reputation, it's fair to say tha1 giuffre's reputation terms of reputation, it's fair to say tha1 giuffre's reputa says terms of reputation, it's fair to say thai giuffre's reput annette? absolutely. it says that she is in abuse _

Things , Abuse , Girls , Thatjeffrey-epstein , Prince-andrew , Admission , Something , Guilt , Paedophile-jeffrey-epstein , Association-withjeffrey-epstein , Association-with-jeffrey-to-say , Virginia-giuffre

State of the Union With Jake Tapper-20191124-17:06:00

because if we do, it's basically carte blanche for this president and anyone who comes after him, but are we also prepared to say that congress will tolerate the complete stonewalling of an impeachment inquiry or our oversight, because if we do, it will mean that the impeachment clause is a complete nullity and more than that, our oversight ability is really an ability in name only. >> but if that's your view and you've also said that this week's testimony, quote, goes right to the heart of the issue of bribery, and you've also said that what you've seen is, quote, far more serious than what nixon did, explain to me how you have not come to the conclusion that the president should be impeached? i mean, it sounds like he should be impeached. >> well, i certainly think that the evidence that's been produced overwhelmingly shows serious misconduct by the president. but i do want to hear more from my constituents and i want to hear more from my colleagues. this is not a decision i'll be making alone. but at the end of the day, this is a decision about whether the

David-holmes , Clinton-impeachment , Congress , Anyone , Oversight , Impeachment-inquiry , Stonewalling , Carte-blanche , Testimony , To-quote-my-colleague-chairman-nadler , Issue , View