Page 33 - Opening Argument News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

There's something to go back on. >> that is why, i think, joan, this does read as the opening argument for the defense, that you do have, as steve just pointed out, a kind of preimpeachment, a prebrutal of anything kelly might say. it does read like anyone who could potentially give evidence that perhaps chris christie perhaps knew anything, et cetera is being taken down. but the women are the ones being accused of having some sort of emotional problem. >> and people now try to blame this report on randy mastro and crihristies lawyers have done ts thing. but i can't believe this went out witho...

Government has a compelling interest in making sure that employers provide this benefit to women. >> now, beyond that question of whether the morning after pill, et cetera, are abortfacients or not, the question was whether or not this kind of case can be transferable. they had specific questions about what else can be implied by a ruling in hobby lobby's favor. and you tweeted that they asked specifically whether they can refuse to cover things like vaccines and blood transfusions. how did that exchange go down? >> this case has really brought implications beyond just contraception. sotomayor...

We don't mean somewhere. never means never. so this is a vote for accountability. norms and laws that keep the civilized world civil mean nothing if they're not enforced. as justice jackson said in his opening argument at the nuremberg trials, the ultimate step in avoiding periodic wars, which are inevitable in a system of international lawlessness, is to make statesmen responsible to the law. if the world's worst despots see they can flout with impunity prohibitions against the world's worst weapons, then those prohibitions are just pieces of paper. that is what we mean by accountability, and...

Don't mean, sometimes, we don't mean somewhere. never means never. so this is a vote for accountability. norms and laws that keep the civilized world civil mean nothing if they are not enforced. as justice jackson said in his opening argument at the nur berg trials, to make statesman responsible to the law. if the world's worst des pits see they can go without prohibitions against the world's worst weapons then those prohibitions are pieces of paper. that is what we mean by accountability and what we mean by we cannot be silent. let me be clear.

Sometimes, we don't mean somewhere. never means never. so this is a vote for accountability. norms and laws that keep the civilized world civil mean nothing if they're not enforced. as justice jackson said in his opening argument at the nuremberg trials, the ultimate step in avoiding periodic wars which are inevitable in a system of international lawlessness is to make statesmen responsible to the law. if the world's worst despots see that they can flout with impunity prohibitions against the world's worst weapons, then those prohibitions are just pieces of paper. that is what we mean by accou...