Page 8 - Opinion Side News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

They were fact checking the nonsense coming from the opinion side. that is what was pissing off the executives. so it's a nor nuanced problem than people want it to be. i think paul is very sincere and honest when he says that he's counseled this from the get-go, that this stuff is poisonous to the fox brand and to conservatism. i just think that the current leadership at fox, particularly susan scott, the ceo, who basically just gave the booze and car keys to the fastest drivers, is not currently situated to make that transition. but, yeah, if the republican party can't turn fox around and ma...

Also fascinating because they show that multiple hosts believed one thing, but we're texting one thing. in fact, in many cases, we're ripping on donald trump and then saying something completely different on television -- given that, how do you think this case is going to turn out out? >> i think what's so fascinating about that is that sometimes we call fox an opinion network or we say that the opinion side -- which is the prime time side -- is different than the new side. but in this case, we see that fox is not really even opinion journalism either. because true opinion that fox hosts and l...

Handful of fox people resulted in a company crisis, that means the company is not a news company. because giving truthful news actually was a big problem. so, that's what the court documents are so fascinating for. it's this tale of the tables are being turned on fox -- >> the court documents were also fascinating because they show that multiple hosts believed one thing, but we're texting one thing. in fact, in many cases, we're ripping on donald trump and then saying something completely different on television -- given that, how do you think this case is going to turn out out? >> i think wha...

>> well, of course, i was on the opinion side of things. i was totally shocked, like everyone else that morning. mi thought it was a great scoop. it seems like we had reported it very thoroughly. and then we saw 10:00 in the morning facebook announced it would quote, ungovernment reduce circulation on the story pending fact checking. and twitter all together banned the story not only could you not share it on your public timeline but you couldn't send it in direct messages. and then they suspended the twitter account of "the new york post." america's oldest continuously published daily newspap...

Right to do so because those lawmakers refused to cooperate. refused to answer questions about the key attack on democracy. they will not, i promise you, will not get answers from these members before the hearings. but perhaps in a fight with the appellate court in the supreme court, ultimately, they may get the answers at the end of the day. >> you know, carol, you are new side reporter. i am on the opinion side of the paper. so i will give my opinion. i just think that a sitting member of congress has a patriotic duty to answer the questions of a committee investigating an attack on their wo...