Page 8 - Page 3 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Donald trump have to explain that to a federal judge who's presiding over his felony case. >> mary, let me read for you an interesting passage here from page 9. it's headlined "other disputed revisions." and it's kind of revealing. and we'll get into it in a second. but part of it reads, "despite the extraordinarily limited time president trump had to prepare this response, we attempted to confer with the government in good faith over the weekend by sending our proposed revisions and arranging multiple phone calls. setting aside our general dispute regarding the treatment of nonsensitive docum...

And frankly it's not a complete or thorough or fair discussion about the constitution or our laws. >> charlie, if you thought that this was not going to be about politics, think again because it's clear from just skimming through this right now over the last couple minutes, the defense is intending on making politics front and center. again, i'm going to read an excerpt from page 4. "against this backdrop the government requests the court assume the role of censor and impose content-based regulations on president trump's political speech that would forbid him from publicly discussing or disclo...

Sure that they can share information even with people they are not paying as part of the defense. that's a big red flag to me because think about it this way. rudy giuliani is an attorney. well, if trump isn't paying him for legal counsel but they say we're going to treat him as part of our defense even though he's an unindicted co-conspirator, you can see many problems with why that might be concerning. so you have to ask yourself, who is it that they want to share material with who they are not paying as part of the defense? >> and we are just getting here as i mentioned the printout of the ...

Different messages. and so the idea that a court can't look at i along history of behavior including behavior that donald trump took when he was president and roger stone was on trial to threaten people, the things he did to dangle pardons to try to influence witnesses, and so all of this is to say it's not like there isn't a long history of behavior here that is a backdrop, that helps us distinguish what's free speech versus witness tampering. >> charlie, an interesting point brought up on page 9. definition of authorized persons. and i ask that in the context of what it is saying. the govern...

With a new ride. we'll drive you happy at carvana. with former president trump set to appear in court on tuesday in miami, the question tonight is, what is the legal road ahead? we have nick akerman who was an assistant special watergate prosecutor and dave aronberg. dave, i want to get to you. where you are is important to where we may be talking about very soon when it comes to the jury pool, but, nick, as you read through the indictment being a former watergate prosecutor, i wonder what you made of it as you saw on page 3, where trump was accused of suggesting his attorney falsely represe...