Page 3 - Peace Groups News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> mayor daley wanted to show off how he turned into a modern show place. >> it chicago loves size, scale. one hotel brags it has more flush toilets under one roof than any other building in the world. >> daley's administration was absolutely committed that in his city, this was not going to be a place where protesters were going to have a platform. this was going to be a place where there were going to be put in their place. >> no one will be able to take over the convention hall or streets of chicago. >> mayor daley exercised such control over the city, you couldn't even get near the convent...

♪ the rules have changed today >> the war in vietnam. ♪ have no place to stay >> a number of men killed last week in vietnam was the highest this summer. >> they are running an all-white political party in 1968. ♪ my tears have come and gone >> we all need george c. wallace for our president of the united states. >> bovote republican in novembe >> the peace groups are demanding permission to march on convention hall. >> these cops here are tough. they'd kill you with a smile. >> as long as i'm mayor of this town, there will be law and order in chicago. >> this is the moment of truth for ...

So why the heck are 16 senate democrats co-sponsoring this piece of legislation? it's not like there's some broad popular revolt against the iran talks. polling shows public support and agreement is skeptical it will work. diplomacy endorsed by everyone from peace groups to the head of the council on foreign relations and the "washington post" editorial page which seems to almost always side with the neocons on these matters. so the only plausible answer is that these democrats either genuinely want military escalation with iran, or they are afraid of the extremely powerful and influential ame...

Democrats co-sponsoring this piece of legislation? it's not like there's some broad popular revolt against the iran talks. polling shows public support and agreement is skeptical it will work. diplomacy endorsed by everyone from peace groups to the head of the council on foreign relations and the "washington post" editorial page which seems to almost always side with the neocons on these matters. so the only plausible answer is that these democrats either genuinely want military escalation with iran, or they are afraid of the extremely powerful and influential american/israel political action ...

Diplomacy to the ground and salt the ashes end of story. why the heck are 16 democrats co sponsors this piece of legislation, it's not like there's some broad revolt against the talks. they're skeptical it will work. diplomacy has been endorsed by peace groups to the head of the foreign relations. the only plausible answer is that the democrats either genuinely want military e escalation with iran or they're afraid aipac which has made passing this bill their current number one priority. they're making a political calculation that is in their political interest not to cross aipac and its allie...