Page 4 - Pit Gender News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The emotion or the meaning of it? . >> i thought it was well done if you agree with the intentions or dead i do appreciate the message behind the ad but it is so potent right now that a company willing to alienate 60 percent of their client base. so while the intention may have been good i thought it was a very bad business decision. greg: i think it is a subset of liberalism of identity politics that pit gender against each other i don't think we would've had that commercial except we pit mail against female or gender against gender or race against race. the point of our commercials is that w...

>> greg: as halloween approaches media clowns are out in full costume in hypocritical outrage accusing everyone else of ginning up anger. how you be so coarse, they reply. my response, cram it you jerks. let's remind two months the kavanaugh hearings our modern witch trial where we watched a man get destroyed before his family enabled by a salivating hateful media slime packaged by well-oiled machine. ache sayings gross. nothing close as ever come from the other side. as women in costume suggested a future where kavanaugh would enslave and brutalize women. left wing nuts crashed the hearing. o...

Negotiations over daca only because they were being led by "five white men" as if that was inherently discrediting. >> that is something different. that is something i think that trump brings up for a lot of people, which is that he has in his one year in office already made the least cabinet -- the least diverse cabinet edna generation. his court appointments have been 91% white male. if you look at that as a woman, you think -- obviously women are not the only people on the planet, i don't believe they should been p the only people in positions of power but president trump doesn't seem to fe...

Are legal or not. that court decision was a frightening one that five men should get down to the specifics of whether a woman should pay for it herself or her boss. it's not her boss's business. >> nancy pelosi either doesn't know what she is talking about or is intentionally misleading you. first of all t gender of the justices in the hobby lobby majority is irrelevant. that's an intent to stoke resentment. when rowe versus wade was decided it was all men in the majority. does she think those justices were ill equipped to fairly decide that case or is it only when a judge disagrees with mrs. ...

Are legal or not. that court decision was a frightening one that five men should get down to the specifics of whether a woman should pay for it herself or her boss. it's not her boss's business. >> nancy pelosi either doesn't know what she is talking about or is intentionally misleading you. first of all t gender of the justices in the hobby lobby majority is irrelevant. that's an intent to stoke resentment. when rowe versus wade was decided it was all men in the majority. does she think those justices were ill equipped to fairly decide that case or is it only when a judge disagrees with mrs. ...