Page 45 - Policy Implications News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Taken before perhaps to address this? >> the trump administration is looking -- it's the whole government. yesterday in the demonstration of symbolism, the secretary of state, and for the national security council, i ran the ministerial, the secretary of defense, secretary mattis was there at the spoke as well and we had all the senior cabinet members there. secretary of treasury, secretary of homeland security, the policy implications are it's an immediate threats, it's something the president is considering, we have secretary mattis given to the president hey, of plan to deal with radical is...

Confirmation. in that washington you aired your grievances at the hearing and you said "but the president won the election, elections have consequences, he's qualified, the president gets his guy." just like they're doing here. you lay your markers on abortion rights and business interests, democrats do that. and the flip side when it's a democratic nominee the republicans do that. washington has changed to the point now where part of this, a lot of these votes against judge neil gorsuch from the democratic side will be from democrats who will privately tell you of course he's qualified and th...

We intervene? well, they have proposals. there are policy implications for this. that working with religious groups, working with community groups, working with adolescents could prevent the eventual radicalization of those who do become violent years later. but they do not learn this from their parents and they do not arrive this way. nor do their parents. that has important implications. it means as you've pointed out that, "extreme vetting" whatever that is, doesn't work, isn't necessary and second of all that there are things we can do in communities. and i'm thinking back to -- you did an...

Some 16 years later and how can we intervene? well, they have proposals. there are policy implications for this. that working with religious groups, working with community groups, working with adolescents could prevent the eventual radicalization of those who do become violent years later. but they do not learn this from their parents and they do not arrive this way. nor do their parents. that has important implications. it means as you've pointed out that, "extreme vetting" whatever that is, doesn't work, isn't necessary and second of all that there are things we can do in communities. and i'...

Take? >> well, the policy implications are fat nating because their conclusions are first of all that people do not enter here radicalized. second that parents do not come and are not radicalized when they arrive nor do that become radicalized. who becomes radicalized? the children become radicalized some 16 years later and how can we intervene? well, they have proposals. there are policy implications for this. that working with religious groups, working with community groups, working with adolescents could prevent the eventual radicalization of those who do become violent years later. but the...