Page 23 - Privacy Issue News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

People in counterterrorism always understand that. you never get it zero-sum game. you don't have to go back farther in time to see examples of "jihad jane". the tsarnaev brothers. they're looking for impressionable individuals, looking for people already existing in infidel countries. whether they contact them online, whether they meet them directly, and "jihad jane" was a case of both, then it doesn't matter because their objective continues to be the same, find people who then they can bring over to the dark side as it were. martha: sooner or later they will be successful as they were in bo...

>> jack, what has the response been since you put this out there. you get a lot of youtube hits anyway. >> yeah. usually i'm looking for reasons to come up with a new prank video. this was a really interesting response because i get to come on cool new shows like this. people are interested because it's sort of a privacy issue. >> it's a disconnect between what we put up in the privacy on our terminal at home and what you find on the boardwalk at various places. >> absolutely. 100%. >> where does everyone find you? >> jack veil films on youtube. >> we knew that because we did a background chec...

The one example you mentioned i am not aware of, but we have two issues and one is the security as it relates primarily to financial information. i think that is important. but secretary sebelius did stress there is none of that information that is actually kept on the website. there is a referral on the website to financial information to see what kind of subsidee you are available for, but none of that information is stored. it doesn't mean it couldn't be hacked which i think we have to be careful about. but again none of that information is kept. the other one is the privacy issue and i thi...

Provide this information in their applications? so regardless of this clause, please comment on the privacy issue and where it's irrelevant. >> in the past, any individual american who was in an employer based coverage, in government coverage like the ones we enjoy, in medicare, in medicaid, in the v.a., a whole variety of plan, that's about 95% of insured americans, had no medical underwriting. had group protections. people outside that consumer protected space were individuals buying their open coverage in an shred market. medical underwriting demanding health records and often going through...

And i think that this privacy issue is another red herring. and i'm going to ask you a question about that. but before that, i just wanted to say this whole idea that is being brought up today that somehow, you know, policies are being canceled and people don't have alternatives, it's just another red herring. what i think my colleagues on the other side forget is that this is not socialized medicine, this is in fact private insurance in a competitive market. if i'm an insurance company and all of a sudden everyone else is selling a better policy with better benefits at a lower price, i can't ...