Page 13 - Privileged Information News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Was no collusion in the russian investigation. >> is that why he tried to fire the special counsel? >> not contemplating the firing. if he thought there was no collusion and sat down with the white house counsel and in a private conversation, the president in a privilege conversation with his attorney. i did go to harvard law school. i know a privilege conversation. i know he had interlopers in the white house last june that were leaking information on him that was very unfair. you're telling me your president is not allowed to have a confidential conversation with the whoit house counsel? >> ...

>> do you trust the fbi? >> i'm very disturbed. as is the general. as it everybody else that is in intelligence. when you look at five months this is the late great rose mary woods. right? this is large scale version. that was 18 minutes. this is five months. they say it's 50,000 texts. and it's prime time. that's disturbing. >> now, what is disturbing. two things. one, the president had every reason to know when he said that that those missing texts weren't a mystery. the fbi the inspector general the investigation into them had already given information to lawmakers the reason they were miss...

Believes there was no collusion. despite only being in the white house eleven days i work for the president for 18 months i didn't see any collusion. there's been news stories that had to be shot down and people fired over the russian investigation. point number four, robert mueller is still in his job. as a special investigation. he is still in his swrob and the president said recently that he expects mueller to treat him fairly. and obviously believes he's going to be exonerated. you're telling me a private conversation. >> it doesn't matter if it was a private conversation. >> with your cou...

Matter asserted. it doesn't matter. it doesn't matter it was private. >> when you have interloping leakers inside the white house. >> irrelevant. >> it's not. totally relevant. >> how the information came out is irrelevant. the substance is relevant. if the reporting is to be believed, don mcga nn -- >> did he fire the guy? >> it's bad for you. it's wrong to do. the president relented. >> you're not listening. >> you're making these silly points. >> i'm i trying to tell you that you're focused on something that isn't fair to the president. the president -- i'll accept mag

I say that now. i think the president feels that now. he indicated recently or sometime last month he feels mr. mueller will be fair and he would like to see the investigation complete and move forward. i don't know. let's see if i could respond to something you said. maybe we can agree disagree. there's proof here that this means the president wanted to interfere with mr. mueller and the investigation. >> i said that's a question for investigators. >> yeah, okay. maybe i misunderstood. it's too early to draw conclusions from one press report. we know sometimes we have it wrong and some other ...