Page 3 - Process Claims News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

I think the argument that i'm going to be watching that is a bit more nuanced is how republicans on capitol hill justify. this we've seen similars who are going to be the next people who consider whether or not the president should be impeach affidavit the house change their argument a little bit in the past week. now i don't want to talk about it. i'm going to be a juror in a senate trial. but really, it's a topic republicans and democrats in the senate want to avoid. what i'll be watching is how they message this and how they don't necessarily focus on the substance of the allegations and wh...

More on process claims or questions of trying to make it just a partisan exercise. >> nancy, on that last point, the less charitable way to put it is they know better. and because they know better, this is going to get tougher sledding for this. >> absolutely. and i think so that it already has gotten tough sledding for them. we've seen a bunch of them come out and sort of hide from my colleagues in the senate, hide from my colleagues who cover the hill saying o, they haven't read the transcript, or they're not familiar with the documents, when in fact they've been splashed all over the news w...

Will likely be a senate trial perhaps in january or february or maybe in december depending on how it goes. >> it's a senate resolution. it's not a binding sort of thing. the way these resolutions are structured, there are several paragraphs of background and then a couple of real points that close it out as a resolution. they do make some strong arguments that kind of question the motives and the legitimacy of what the house is doing. but the ultimate conclusion, the three points at the end are pretty focused mild process claims. they would like the minority to be able to issue subpoenas in t...

President had clearly committed a criminal act. a crime. i just witnessed the president commit a crime. what can you say to that? well the president and his defenders are basically trying two arguments. one that what president trump did was totally fine, and another a nonstop fire hose of ridiculous process claims. kangaroo court, none of that matters because the facts are already in the light. we have them. there are documents and texts and admissions by the president. and i say crime advisably. it was a white house official who works for the president who listened to the phone call that led ...

Crime. i just witnessed the president commit a crime. what can you say to that? well the president and his defenders are basically trying two arguments. one that what president trump did was totally fine, and it ps a perfect phone call. and the other is a kind of nonstop fire hose of ridiculous process claims. adam schiff is this, nancy pelosi that, a kangaroo court, yada, yada, yada. the whistle-blower only had sec secondhand knowledge. none of thatse matters because e facts are already in the light. we have them. there are documents and texts and admissions by the president and i say crime a...