Live Breaking News & Updates on Properties court

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Properties court on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Properties court and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Breaking News | Breaking News UK court bars Thisday, Arise TV chairman, Obaigbena from serving as director of any company for 7 year

Views: Visits
116
Nduka Obaigbena, the founding Chairman and Editor-in-Chief of THISDAY newspaper, ARISE News Channel and ARISE Magazine, has been disqualified from serving as a director of a company in the United Kingdom for seven years.
The application for disqualification was made by Anthony Annon, an Official Receiver at the Business and Properties Court of England and Wales, under Section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 and arose from the compulsory liquidation of Arise Networks Ltd of which Obaigbena was the sole director since its incorporation on October 30, 2012.
Following a couple of successful businesses in Nigeria, Obaigbena extended his Arise TV network to the UK, concentrating on African News and events. Going forward, the UK company had zero turnover and depended wholly on funds provided by associated businesses in Nigeria.

Nigeria , United-kingdom , Nigerian , Nduka-obaigbena , Anthony-annon , Kevin-nduka , Networks-ltd , Media-ventures-ltd , Properties-court , Company-directors-disqualification , Official-receiver , Company-directors-disqualification-act

Family Law Week: IU anonymised [2020] EWFC 98

IU v OS [2020] EWFC 98
This case concerned an application for a financial remedy brought by IU, a wife (‘W’), against OS, her husband (‘H’).
___
Cohen J's judgment is long (48 pages, 288 paragraphs). This is unsurprising in circumstances where the litigation lasted over 3 years, where the court heard from 12 witnesses (including H and W), where hand-writing experts where asked to assess various documents produced by H (and his team) which themselves required translation and where orders had to be obtained on behalf of W for documentation to be produced by H's solicitors (producing previously withheld and relevant evidence). W's costs (including interest) were c. £2.5-£2.6m.

Miami , Florida , United-states , Hampstead , Camden , United-kingdom , New-york , Kiev , Ukraine-general , Ukraine , Russia , London