Live Breaking News & Updates on Ram nandan

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Ram nandan on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Ram nandan and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Subodh Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2024

Subodh Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2024
indiankanoon.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from indiankanoon.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Patna , Bihar , India , Surat , Gujarat , Supaul , Hasanpur , Delhi , Dahari , Himachal-pradesh , State-of-andhra-pradesh , Andhra-pradesh

'Game Changer' Has Fictional Role Of Pawan Kalyan?

The highly anticipated film "Game Changer," starring global star Ram Charan and directed by the renowned S Shankar, entered into shooting mode again, as

Ram-charan , Pawan-kalyan , Ram-charan-shankar , Ram-nandan , Election-commission , Ramoji-film , Game-changer , Election-officer , Andhra-pradesh , Chief-election-commission , Ktr , Ndia-today-telangana-ppe-survey

UPSC Key—23rd November, 2023: Sedition law in India, Article 311 of the Constitution, Taiwan and China

Exclusive for Subscribers from Monday to Friday: Why China-Taiwan tensions and ‘One China’ policy are relevant to the UPSC Exam? What significance do topics like Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, Section 124A of Indian Penal Code, Ghol fish, BRICS expansion and Pakistan have for both the preliminary and main exams? You can learn more by reading the Indian Express UPSC Key for November 23, 2023.



Taiwan , Kyrgyzstan , Taiwan-strait , Taiwan-general- , Brazil , United-states , Kashmir , Jammu-and-kashmir , India , United-arab-emirates , Delhi , Haryana

Dissent vs. Sedition: Courts have laid down the law, put up guard rails

When an amendment to Section 124A made its way to the IPC in 1898, it stood to define sedition as an offence that incites or seeks to incite emotions of dissatisfaction with the government.Interestingly, sedition accounts for less than 0.01 per ...

India , United-kingdom , Jammu , Jammu-and-kashmir , Allahabad , Uttar-pradesh , Kedar-nath , Uttaranchal , Bihar , Patiala , Punjab , State-of-uttar-pradesh

India's History With Sedition Law Explained as Law Commission Backs Stricter Provision

Explained: The government has begun to hold consultations over the law commission's recommendation that the sedition law be retained and made stricter

India , Allahabad , Uttar-pradesh , United-kingdom , Haryana , Bihar , British , Ram-nandan , Thomas-macaulay , Arjun-ram-meghwal , Tara-singh-gopi-chand , Kedar-nath-singh

Dissent & Democracy: Why the Sentinel Should Strike Down IPC Sec. 124A

Sedition laws sit at the crossroads of politics and society, and law and justice. The political nature of this “offence against the state” tests the limits of free speech a citizen can rightfully enjoy. India’s polity has changed since 1870, when Sedition was added as an offence under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to govern restive subjects of the British Crown. This stifling legislation, conceived as a colonial tool to incarcerate freedom fighters, continues to be quickly invoked by free India’s elected rulers against dissenting citizens, deeply damaging the country’s democratic fabric.<br/><br/> This law which chips away at the essence of republican democracy – the right to dissent – has a chequered journey in independent India starting from 1950, when courts upheld free speech. However, the First Amendment to the Constitution put a damper on such liberal judicial interventions. Since then, although judgments urged governments to exercise restraint, the latter chose to unreservedly invoke Sec. 124A to quell dissenters—including protest movements and individuals—expressing views that run afoul of ruling establishments. On May 11, 2022, the Supreme Court accepted the Union Government’s plea that it would re-examine Sec. 124A, but suspended pending criminal trials and court proceedings, and said that it “hopes and expects” Union and State governments to refrain from using this legal provision while it is under reconsideration. <br/><br/> In this essay, <b>Eklavya Vasudev, a Lawyer and Doctoral candidate in Law at the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany</b>, argues the case for a well-reasoned judgment by the Supreme Court striking down Sec. 124A of the IPC in its entirety by asserting its role as the sentinel of the Constitution. Doing so, he points out, will forestall any moves by governments to abuse the law in some form or the other, be consistent with positions taken by previous Supreme Court judgments and give life to the vision of the founders of the Constitution who unanimously voted against using “sedition” to restrict free speech. On the other hand, leaving Sec. 124A as it is, narrowing its scope, or letting the government replace it with either an updated or a different legislation, will mean a judicial nod for the “sedition juggernaut to roll on in one form or the other to thwart dissent in a secular and democratic republic”.

India , Pakistan , Khap , Balochistan , Ramana , Punjab , United-states , United-kingdom , Uttar-pradesh , Delhi , Bihar , Madras