Page 20 - Record Spending News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> much higher. >> this is the first time -- fir presidential election $200 million has been spent on negative advertising. >> 35% of republicans with barack obama in the white house are not enthusiastic? that tells you more about mitt romney than anything, he's not an attract attractive candidate. >> but the incumbent is unattractive. >> i understand that but mitt romney is about the worst candidate you could put against barack obama. >> why are you spending so much money and sweating it and -- >> a lot more than that. >> how much is karl rove spending? 250 million bucks. >> record spending. ...

>> much higher. >> this is the first time -- fir presidential election $200 million has been spent on negative advertising. >> 35% of republicans with barack obama in the white house are not enthusiastic? that tells you more about mitt romney than anything, he's not an attract attractive candidate. >> but the incumbent is unattractive. >> i understand that but mitt romney is about the worst candidate you could put against barack obama. >> why are you spending so much money and sweating it and -- >> a lot more than that. >> how much is karl rove spending? 250 million bucks. >> record spending. ...

The key order in mr. obama's statement is cause. he can't deny he championed record spending because he has. he didn't cause it. what say you? >> the numbers on this are devastating. and, however, he parts his words or tries to use the cute restaurant analogy, doesn't change the fact that now we have more money added to our national debt during his three and a half years than we had added to the national debt in the first 219 years of our republic. that is a staggering figure. so he is right to some extent, bush did overspend and overspend big and the companies who followed him down that path ...

The key order in mr. obama's statement is cause. he can't deny he championed record spending because he has. he didn't cause it. what say you? >> the numbers on this are devastating. and, however, he parts his words or tries to use the cute restaurant analogy, doesn't change the fact that now we have more money added to our national debt during his three and a half years than we had added to the national debt in the first 219 years of our republic. that is a staggering figure. so he is right to some extent, bush did overspend and overspend big and the companies who followed him down that path ...

Families with three plus people in them, children with three plus children, 9.5%. >> that's -- it's important to point out that that is during the recovery period. when we're supposed to be recovering, getting better off. >> recovery is supposed to help those people! >> precisely. we got much worse off. >> it all depends on how you define recovery. because is recovery the gdp or what are they looking at to define that you're not in a recession anymore? it's two consecutive quarters of growth. >> that's a highly politicized statement, isn't it? what is a recovery? >> that's why i'm asking it. >...