Page 14 - Reporting Requirement News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

$100,000 mark. >> it looks like they were purposefully structured in that way to avoid some reporting requirement. >> i want to read a statement that columbus nova has put out, the american arm of this affiliate of a russian company. they said after the inauguration, the firm hired michael cohen regarding potential sources of capital and potential investments in real estate and other skren ventures. reports today that viktor vekselberg used columbus nova as a conduit for payments to michael cohen are false. he was not hired by cohen or provided funding for his engagement. >> well, columbus nov...

It would be a blunder, disaster, i'm not here for that. legally speaking, it's a tricky nuanced question. >> and big news this week, we are told president trump ordered to be fired. but then he backed down when the special counsel threatened to quit over this. >> that is interesting because it highlights what you asked me and some new gloss. there are a lot of debates open on this. he may have ordered it and then don mcgahn said, here are a number of reasons why you shouldn't do this and the president backed down. as far as the reporting requirement, did they have to report it? not clear. i kn...

Latest legislative push. plus he's reportedly set to decertify the iran nuclear deal. expert analysis on whether that's the right call. the first, matt thornberry. >> it's important for everybody to understand the certification were talking about is not part of the iran agreement. it's a reporting requirement to congress that goes beyond the iran agreement. talk to your doctor, and call 844-234-2424. [woman 1] huh. can't find my [woman 2] oh no... [woman 1] oh, it's fine. [woman 2] yeah, totally. it's fine. but like...is it fine though? because, i would maybe be worried...really, really, reall...

>> i don't know for sure, but i think he may well. it's important for everybody to understand the certification we are talking about is not part of the iran agreement. it is a reporting requirement to congress that actually goes beyond the iran agreement. so it may be that the president says look, this is i have concerns about this. they are not letting us into all decide. i have doubts whether this is in the best interest of the united states. but still not reimpose sanctions, not actually withdraw from the agreement itself. maria: he pushes it onto congress and you and your colleagues have t...

Could look into it and maybe, quote, unquote, renegotiate it, you just have to stay in. the united states could have followed as many or as few of its own targets as it wanted. >> because it was the u.s.'s own commitment. >> it's its own commitment that it was promising to voluntarily follow, which means that if it had just said, well, we changed our minds, we're redoing those goals, there's no penalty. there's not even a reporting requirement to anybody. the whole thing is mystifying. >> that seems to be the only area where they had danced around their disagreement but acknowledged there was ...