Live Breaking News & Updates on Rigorous Test Programme|Page 2
Stay updated with breaking news from Rigorous test programme. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Now, as we mentioned earlier, the co founder of 0ceangate, the firm that built and operate,the titan submersible has rejected claims that it cut corners. guillermo sonhelm left 0ceangate ten years ago. he s been speaking to the bbc. the innovation outpaces the regulations and oftentimes, 0ne one of the issues that keeps coming up one of the issues that keeps coming up is that people keep equating certification with safety and are ignoring the 14 years of development of the titan sub. any expert who weighs in on this, including mr cameron, will also admit they were not there for the design of the sub, the engineering, the building of the sub and not the rigorous test programme the sub went through. this was a 14 year testing programme that it went through and like any successful science expeditions to the titanic over the last three years. let s cross live now ....
Everyone keeps equating certification with safety and is ignoring the 14 years of development of the titan sub. any expert who weighs in on this, including mr cameron, will also admit that they were not there for the design of the sub, for the engineering of the sub, for the building of the sub, and certainly not for the rigorous test programme that the sub went through. investigations will now begin into what caused the mission to the titanic to fail so catastrophically. simon jones, bbc news. oui’ our correspondent from boston give us this update our correspondent from boston give us this update that our correspondent from boston give us this update that the our correspondent from boston give us this update that the sound our correspondent from boston give us this update that the sound on sunday was consistent with an implosion. it sounds like they detected something around the time that the titan was last heard from as it began its dive down to the wreckage on sunday. we ....
Denies it cut corners. everyone keeps equating certification with safety and is ignoring the 14 years of development of the titan sub. any expert who weighs in on this, including mr cameron, will also admit that they were not there for the design of the sub, for the engineering of the sub, for the building of the sub, and certainly not for the rigorous test programme that the sub went through. investigations were now begin into what caused the mission to the titanic to fail so catastrophically. simon jones, bbc news. let s get the latest from danjohnson, our correspondent in boston, which is where the search operation had been coordinated. a growing list of questions for the company that operated this vessel? yes, a huge number of questions and is a growing yes, a huge number of questions and is a growing debate about this whole area of is a growing debate about this whole area of deep sea exploration as ....
Explorer hamish harding, the others on board were british businessman shahzada dawood and his son suleman, the french explorer paul henri nargeolet, and the subs us captain, stockton rush. every time i dive, i see something i ve never seen before. deep sea experts had raised concerns about safety, according to the director of the movie titanic, james cameron, who has completed 33 dives to the wreck. i would submit that there s a terrible irony here. here we have, at the wreck of titanic, we now have another wreck that is based on, unfortunately, the same principles of not heeding warnings. any expert who weighs in on this, including mr cameron, will also admit that they were not there for the design of the sub, the engineering of the sub, the building of the sub, and certainly not for the rigorous test programme that the sub went through. ....
They have cut any corners. any exert they have cut any corners. any expert who they have cut any corners. any expert who weighs in on this will also admit expert who weighs in on this will also admit that expert who weighs in on this will also admit that they expert who weighs in on this will also admit that they were - expert who weighs in on this will also admit that they were not. also admit that they were not there for the also admit that they were not there for the design also admit that they were not there for the design of also admit that they were not there for the design of the also admit that they were not there for the design of the sub also admit that they were not there for the design of the sub for- also admit that they were not there for the design of the sub for the - for the design of the sub for the engineering for the design of the sub for the engineering of for the design of the sub for the engineering of the for the design of the sub for the en ....