Page 35 - Roberts Rules News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Unanimous consent that were defeated. republicans trying to make parliamentary rules that would require members to stand at their desks and do their votes in person that way rather than through the electronic system. all of this just delays tactics at this point as we move inex-orbly towards the debate at lunchtime. >> it's important to say why we're covering this. this is the day most likely the president will be impeached. it's history in the making. we want everybody at home to get this, wherever you are, to understand how this process works. you a lot of procedural yes, sir like move the p...

Federal election commission because a conservative activist shaun mccutcheon sued the commission arguing those donation limits violated his right to free speech. now, under this new ruling, mr. mccutcheon and other high-dollar donors can donate to as many federal candidates and political committees as they want. the case did not, did not alter the donation limits on the total amount people can give to each candidate. now, instead of being limited to about $123,000 spread across candidates and groups, there is no limit under the new ruling on those total contributions in a campaign cycle. senat...

It at some point i think it is entirely possible. >> i was interested today to get my advanced copy of time magazine. robert's rules. there is a lot of coverage today of the chief justice. do you expect to see the mainstream media revise its opinion of john roberts from a right wing zell lot to a statesman? >> for a while. i think it is reasonable to say whether he switched his vote or not that this decision that he reached was more institutional than constitutional. thor matter of it being a tax strains reasoning. it has the ear marks of a tax and it does have some. then i read the dissent on...

It at some point, this there is some points to suggest that is credible. >> chris: i got my advance copy of time magazine, roberts rules. do you ex-about! to see the mainstream media revise the opinion of roberts? >> for awhile. i think it is reasonable to say whether he switched his vote or not this decision that he reached was more institutional than constitutional. the matter of it being a tax i think required some really strained reasoning and i read the portion of the opinion in which he makes the case that this really has the ear marks of a tax and it does have some and then read the dis...

We're back with our roundtable. who got more attention this week, president obama and health care or chief justice john roberts? here's the cover of a special edition of "time" magazine, "roberts rules: re-examining his legacy on the court." this morning, roberts' health care ruling sends a message to politicians. this was this view, savannah, this was a chief justice concerned about the integrity of the court. back in 2007 he spoke to jeff rosen of g.w. law school and the republic and the atlantic. this is what he said back then. in deciding to resist the politicization of the judiciary, robe...