Page 4 - Rosenstein Statement News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

And when do you expect to see some movement, some migration? >> i think it will be a dividing line with the base. right? the base is going to follow this president. they love the president because he is a fighter not because of his policy chops. and when gingrich and others kind of lose their credibility over this issue it will still work with the base. but the hill is a very different question. if the president were to do something that led to the dismissal of mueller i think you would say republicans on the hill begin to break. don't overlook what happened with rosenstein. the hill is stayin...

Likely to be wrong. the track record does not bear that out. time and time again the work of these papers that are breaking these big stories has been substantiated and is extremely credible. so i think it's a very odd statement on multiple levels. >> michael, you are right. and to underscore that, we have had your colleagues on from publications like the times, the post, in stories where they have quoted 20 to 30 source, sourcing by the dozen the likes of which we had never seen. obviously people should be cautious with anonymous sources. vivian, you cover this crowd. and michael went there. ...

It. >> explain why that would be a big deal? >> because this is a sanctioned bank. he would have no legitimate reason for meeting with this banker, sanked by obama administration. even more shocking is that he would have this meeting and not disclose it publicly. then when asked about it, the russian bank and jared kushner had two different answers and two different reasons for having meeting. kushner said it was about administrative decision possibly related to syria. the banker said no, this had to do with personal financialish would you say the kushner family and their business. can't get a...

With the president will lead to the hill republicans breaking even though his base stays with him. >> formerly congressman harold ford. it was a weird statement from rod rosenstein. >> a few of us thought is this real? that's how bad rod rosenstein's statement was. >> think about where we've come from, you had a president who had his vice president, deputy attorney general and attorney general all go out and say we fired him because of performance issues, sluggish morale. director comey, excuse me. sluggish morale. he handled the hillary clinton matter in a way we thought was just reached a le...

I don't quite know what to make of it, frankly. it is vaguely trumpian. it came from rosenstein, would rosenstein put out a statement at the direction the white house or at the direct of the president? who knows? i'm -- it's rank speculation because i really have no idea what that was supposed to mean. >> i wondered if when he was talking about the country, if he is referring to not saying u.s. first in front of -- or u.s. official in frontan an anonymous source. and i think it's really interesting and this point has been made before that this administration is talking about anonymous sources ...