Page 14 - Rule 11 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Of reason." he said you can't have one without the other. you need common sense of the people and you need people to be conducting rg things with -- why was he not ordained to win in any way? because america was the first country in history born in a revolutionary struggle against monarchy. against the very idea that you could have hereditary rule. payne said a hereditary ruler is like a hereditary mathematician. the people have to decide on their own leaders. it was put in the constitution formed by british experience. there was an impeachment that parliament had, but it wasn't

He also -- you know, when it comes to his communications with the president, we tried to get him to list all the communications with the president. i think he gave w us six. and then when he was back at -- hen walked us through each communication with the president. by the way it was a christmas party, when the president of finland was here. and then congresswoman spear asked him the same question in the open hearingm and he said that he had talked to the president like 20 times. so the record is mixed. >> i thinkis my time is up. thank you, both. >> yield back. >> mr. chairman -- mr. chairman...

So i close today with this. it didn't start with mueller or a phone call. you know where this started? it started with tears in brooklyn in november 2016 when an election was lost. we're here, no plan, no fact witnesses, simply being a rubber stamp for what we have but hey, we got law professors here. what a start of a party. mr. chairman, before i yield back i have a motion. under clause 2, rule 11. >> the gentleman was recognized for a purpose of opening statement. not the purpose of making a motion. >> i ask for recognition for clause 2, rule 11. i move to require the attendance of chairman...

>> has everyone voted who wishes to vote? ms. bass? >> she voted. 24 ayes, 17 no, sir, motion to table is agreed to. >> a parliamentary inquiry. >> gentleman will state it. >> thank you, mr. chairman. clause c2 of the judiciary inquiry states members of the committee can raise objections related to testimony of evidence and doesn't say what rules apply to admissibility. i hope you can explain to us what objections can be made under this clause and if you intend to use the federal rules of evidence. >> the gentleman will suspend. not a proper parliamentary inquiry. >> i stated the rule. >> you ...

And today is a waste of time. because this is where we're at. so i close today with this. it didn't start with mueller or a phone call. you know where this started? it started with tiers in brooklyn in november of 2016. when an election was lost. so we are here, no plan, no fact witnesses, simply being a rubber stamp for what we have. but hey, we've got law professors here. what a start of a party. mr. chairman, before i yield back, i have a motion. under clause 2, rule 11. >> the gentleman was recognized for the purpose of an opening statement, not for the purpose of making a motion. >> i yie...