Page 4 - Security Angle News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

In this. that was the statement we saw yesterday. he read from a teleprompter, clearly did it under duress after being sort of urged by aides to do it. it sends a clear message. >> mark murray put out a question this morning, what speaks louder, trump's tweets or his teleprompter reads? i think we just answered the question. tweets. in terms of free speech, you said this movement will continue. they want to g to boston. you've heard from the mayor of boston, he doesn't want the white nationalist movement there. we know texas a&m canceled an event. where does free speech collide with hate speec...

President was interested in burying the scandal, he has taken step that's have hurt him. it is not like he wasn't warned that mike flynn was cozy with russia and he might not be the best person for security angle. and it blew up in his face. the president has made some bad decisions that have added fuel to the fire of this scandal that seems to be ultimately the biggest issue here. all right. we haven't even gotten to the party infighting yet. unbelievable. we'll pause here. you're-stick around for the hour. the truth money stranger than fiction when it comes to the strategy. when i saw on it ...

Inform whether people find that this is good for safety. >> well, i think the process certainly gives the government an opportunity to present whatever evidence it has. as somebody who comes from a national security background, i have serious doubts and concerns that it's going to be able to provide that evidence. but i would say two things about this security angle. first of all, the government was arguing that this wasn't reviewable because the policy was formed based on national security reasons. that, of course, is completely false. the 9th kir sit judged in that way which upholds their ab...

View on that part and whether the process which is getting a lot of attention on that will inform whether people find that this is good for safety. >> well, i think the process certainly gives the government an opportunity to present whatever evidence it has. as somebody who comes from a national security background, i have serious doubts and concerns that it's going to be able to provide that evidence. but i would say two things about this security angle. first of all, the government was arguing that this wasn't reviewable because the policy was formed based on national security reasons. that...

Nondiskrim toir attempt to preserve security, he has not done himself favor by the public statements of banning all muslims. you've had enormous, the idea this isn't related to national security. this isn't framed in a way. >> unless he has evidence to suggest that security paints the light in the security angle. >> if he has that, that might change things slightly. but the job of the judiciary is to interpret the law. i couldn't speculate what that evidence would be. >> jacob, thank you very much. when we come back, silicon valley is standing up against president trump's travel ban. we'll s...