Page 14 - Security Documents News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Today the white house tried to pass the buck to white house intelligence agencies. back with the panel. >> i thought the most important thing he said was drawing that distinction. it is not uncommon to have people there who have not been fully approved. i was there for six weeks, seven weeks waiting for my -- that's normal. but once it's clear that the fbi is not going to approve you because you are a security risk in their eyes, it's normal for you to be out. the idea that there's this whole new category of people who just, y'all ain't never going to be approved but here's some security docum...

Approved but here's some security documents anyway, that is new. it's weird. it's not normal. it's bad. it's risky. it's dangerous. no matter what anybody else tries to say, oh, well, this is a new way of doing government. there's a reason we do it the way we've done it because i hate to keep pointing this out. if somebody can't pass the fbi vet, that means they could be blackmailed. they could be bribed. there's something about them that history has proven people in that category are dangerous to our country. this is not just, you know, hey, it's a nice way to do it. it's a suggestion. this i...

Protected. >> you also serve on the house oversight committee. representative maloney has requested that the committee investigate the white house's knowledge of rob porter's background check, decision to allow him to handle classified material for over a year without that security clearance. a, do you think the committee should investigate that? b, what the questions you have about this situation? >> on a, i actually think we have the information we need. rob porter was a serial wife beater. this guy is astonishing. it's illegal. it's immoral and, by the way, it's really cowardly. and what we...

When you look at donald trump juniors misleading statements that seem to have come from air force one, there is a real possibility that there is not only an obstruction of justice charge but also that when it comes to the filling out of those security documents, those were intentional misleading statements. to jay sekulow's point about the confidential nature of a grand jury, members of the grand jury themselves are required to be confidential and not leak any information but witnesses, a defense attorney that is not allowed to actually say anything, they are not required to stay silent. that ...

Federal government. it's moving security documents on to a private server. but her own people. she's relieved herself of the charge of perjury. she didn't sign the document under oath and she can't be accused of lying under oath. she is still exposed to the same crime that general petraeus is about to plead guilty to, which is taking classified materials on to a non-classified site. she says she was never hacked. >> how does she know? ? >> people she communicated with were hacked. sid blumenthal was hacked. what wer she and sid talking about? benghazi. >> lthe nsa has a copy. if the nsa has it...