Page 10 - Security Warnings News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

He's a bit detached me says let's not rush to judgment unless and until they reach a conclusion, this is beginning to hurt them and him personally. and then they act quickly. >> duke that on benghazi they will act any differently than they have so far given they have been swift about the irs scandal at this point? >> you mentioned at the top, that admiral mullen, ambassador pickering want to go back and defend themselves and defend the finding of their investigation which essentially says the administration got some things wrong but there was no cover-up, there was no plot to mislead the ameri...

23 minutes later, without a response, she emailed again before anyone had even replied to her first expression of alarm to say, quote, i just had a convo with redacted name, and added on that basis i have serious concerns about all the parts highlighted below, and that's when they commenced the argument we've already reported on about whether language about prior security warnings from cia could also be stricken. also deputy national security advisor ben rhodes was alerted that the intelligence communitying was drafting a set of benghazi talking points as 11 right as 11:17 that morning, as was...

Consulate. including our ambassador to libya chris stevens. james rosen has been going through the emails and has a report for us now. james? >> shep, good evening. these 94 largely repetitive pages of white house, cia, and state department emails, mostly dated friday, september 14 raise still further questions. the documents show then state department spokeswoman victoria nuland repeatedly pressing interoffice colleagues so soften the discussion of the perpetrators of the attacks. the line about knowing there were extremists among the demonstrators will come back to us at podium, nuland said....

Decisions were made. and she did not make the security decisions that we felt -- >> was that a problem, do you think? >> no, not at all. i think it was behind the legislation. we looked in to what the congress was saying at the time it passed the legislation to set up the process. and they said it is traditional for heads of agencies to take responsibility then nobody goes down and finds where the decisions were made. and that's what we'd like to see. and we would like to have people held responsible for those performance in those decisions. >> what do you make of the back and forth on the tal...

>> the buck stopped. she'd already made it clear that the buck stopped with her. we were interested in where the decisions were made. and she did not make the security decisions that we felt -- >> was that a problem, do you think? >> no, not at all. i think it was behind the legislation. we looked in to what the congress was saying at the time it passed the legislation to set up the process. and they said it is traditional for heads of agencies to take responsibility then nobody goes down and finds where the decisions were made. and that's what we'd like to see. and we would like to have peopl...