Page 22 - Shadow Banning News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

They shadow-banned. at least he told the truth and said we are coming clean. i shadow band. you can lightsen yourself. >> are you censoring people? >> no. >> twitter shadow-banning prominent republicans. is that true? >> no. dan: guys, the production team obviously screwed up. i told you have to play the clip where jack dorsey admitted to shadow-banning. that's not the clip. you are saying he screwed up, he mishe -- he misspoke. here is jack dorsey finally admitting to shadow banning. >> i think a lot of the statements behind the statements and question behind the question. shadow banning is a...

Up. but the post important part of this is it may not just be big tech. but the fbi was meeting with them before the election. we already know that. the last time i checked, the fbi is a branch of the government. >> that's right. so this should be illegal. the next question is why did twitter do this and who told them to do this, and were they threatened to do this by a certain government agency? did the cdc threaten them? did the fda threaten them? did anthony fauci? did the fbi? i met with dorsey in 2019. it was a warm meeting and he denied he was shadow-banning. but something changed.

A second massive drop of internal Twitter communications reveals further evidence that under old management, the platform was a tool of the far-left authoritarian deep state weaponized against [...]

And twitter covered up for themselves, too, and lied about shadow banning. we put together a mini montage of all the people who said it was a conspiracy theory that we were shadow-banned. >> shadow-banning is something he brought up which a concept that twitter would allow you to post something but effectively make it invisible. >> you would hear all these congressional republicans, why am i being shadow banned. now we realize that that was a t --was a canard. >> there is no proof, yet. dan: i would say i would wait for their apology, but i would be a fossil. they are tyrants. at least twitter...

The real question behind the question is are we doing something according to political ideology or viewpoints. and we are not. period. dan: i'm sorry but that's him not telling the truth about it again. at least he came clean on twitter when he tweeted this. oh, i'm sorry, that's right. we certainly don't shadow-ban with it comes to politicalview points. at least when he was asked by dave rubin if he shadow band, he probably came clean. do you shadow-ban based on political belief. jack replied no. so finally i will give you one final out. maybe jack went rogue. maybe it was the beard. i don't ...