Page 25 - Sham Process News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Outright? i did see a note from adam schiff saying hunter biden not likely to happen already. >> yeah, kendis. it's very much a wish list for republicans trying to prove a point putting certain names on there they knew the democrats would reject, to kem out and say this is a sham process. it's unfair. not giving the president due process even though it's not a criminal proceeding, et cetera, et cetera. a few witnesses they are likely to get. david haile, xander vindman, kurt volker. career diplomats, or white house officials, at the center of this ukraine scandal but democrats likely want to h...

Vindman, the top ukraine expert on the national security council. as the public gets to pore through the damning testimony, the president will be speaking at a rally in atlanta for the new black voices for trump coalition this hour. republicans are readying their defenses of the president with public testimony less than one week away now. republican congressman jim jordan has now been appointed to be a temporary member of the intelligence committee, replacing republican congressman rick crawford. house minority leader kevin mccarthy said jordan's quote addition will ensure more accountability ...

I think this is a sham process. i think the substance is not worthy of an impeachment discussion. read the phone call for yourself. i don't care what anybody else says about the phone call. the phone call, i made up my own mind, is fine. >> harry, that's the chairman of the senate judiciary committee. he's also a potential juror in the impeachment trial saying, la, la, don't tell me anything. >> in fact, that's actually been the latest excuse that republicans have proffered to keep their head in the sand and avoid saying anything about trump. they're not jurors. it's not a criminal trial. it's...

Irregularities. they are very well corroborated, and that's all right. what they are exactly, how many, which ones, and what effect, if any, they have will be determined according to law. >> so, lanhee, you know, to raise that issue without evidence, it seems kind of like a trumpian play even towards the very end, what, to smear the results? >> well, look, i think it's a trumpian edge to a message which is a perfectly reasonable one, you know, when you've got a close race, which is to say, look, we're going to see how this all plays out. obviously the word "irregularities" raises some eyebrows...

Followed, and there is a process. we know for a fact that there have been more than a few irregularities. they are very well-corroborated, and that's all right. what they are exactly, how many, which ones, and what effect, if any, they have will be determined according to law. >> so, jessica, this is the first time i think we've heard this question about irregularities in the vote and it comes because he hasn't won. also, we've had the secretary of state declare it. it's done. why is now this talk of irregularities? >> yeah, two things. one, there's no more process to follow. in a close state ...