Page 4 - Side Conversation News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Moving on to kavanaugh's confirmation. an fbi investigation being opened, and jeff flake coming and building these forces, this coalition to force that. so it was quite a wild ride and something that was remarkable and totally unexpected when the day started, joy. >> yes, indeed. i think a lot of people are trying to speculate whether it was that elevator moment that changed jeff flake's mind or whether it was that conversation that we saw him that have, that side conversation with senators coons and klobuchar. do we know what was said? whether that was what moved him to change his mind to say...

Post cold war has been a debate. i've been to multiple nato summits and feel like it's always a side conversation, what's it going to be. when nato got involved in libya, it was always is this a good idea or a bad idea, what's it going to be. that's still part of this challenge. is that what's making it easier for president trump to potentially blow up this alliance a little bit because nato is uncertain of what its mission is? >> well, i actually think while everyone is focusing on the rhetoric, what i'm told is that there was an agreement on a nato summit declaration today which the presiden...

>> dana: kimberly guilfoyle. >> kimberly: the problem i'm having with this is what is wrong with the president doing something like this? if you are at an event when everyone is there, what's so nefarious about it if he's not able to have a normal conversation with other people that are attending this? this is what people do. >> good question. having covered a lot of these summits, there are all kinds of sideline conversations. you are absolutely right. it doesn't necessarily mean that anything bad or sinister happened. on the other hand, given all these investigations back here stateside, the...

Spray, here are the leaders shaking hands, the others are suggesting wait a second, after the cameras left, there was some sort of "secret meeting" where president trump went over to president putin and went on for some time and didn't bring an american translator or an american official of any kind for this conversation with vladimir putin. why would that be significant? that would suggest there was no public record within the u.s. government of this "meeting." the president wasn't saying this was a meeting, it was on the sidelines, let's talk about syria and other subjects. you remember when...

Dinner. the insinuation that the white house has tried to hide a second meeting is false, malicious and absurd. but, steph, again, the bottom line, the thing that's raising eyebrows for the foreign policy community is the fact that this pull-aside wasn't previously disclosed and the fact that there was only a russian translator there. steph. >> it's extraordinary. i've got to bring my panel in to break this down. two msnbc contributors, new york daily news columnist mike lupica. he says i always say i have the best guests. and you know who's here, he's great. eddie glaude. eddie, i'm going to ...