Page 36 - Side Step News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Would be confirmed and he said yes. but i asked him point blank did you do this, i mean, the perception is that you wanted to side-step a public airing of some of these controversial views. they shot that down. but, i mean, look at the math. they now don't have to have that hearing. not only on the nominee's views, but also relitigating the whole health care debate. i don't think they necessarily wanted to see that. >> andrew? >> well, no. it was interestingly mark raised the issue of them appearing weak. my question is the administration worry about what the public thinks they appear weak byi...

Acted with other people in the united states. assembling this bomb, it looks like the crude attempts of one individual who had some elementary training in how to make a bomb but certainly failed the final test. >> reporter: u.s. counter terrorism officials say there are two threat streams against the united states, recruits that get training overseas and return to the u.s. to launch attacks. now there are a growing number of so-called homegrown extremists who become radicalized without leaving the country. the net effect is the u.s. is fighting extremism on two fronts. >> bret: thank you. >> y...

Afghanistan and we're sending u.s. forces -- excuse me. former u.s. force ors former nate of forces to be reorganized. you combine that with airpower and government support is. do those things well and it works. it's the same thing that happened with the east india company or other organizations that have been in places for a long time, centuries -- >> east indies company, is that what you just said? >> sure. that's called colonial oppression. that's why i brought up -- >> we're talking about gene, that's funny. you think what you're building in the uaa is a side step? >> what i'm saying is --...

Latest updates on this topic from reliable sources.

Proceed here and really establish now a historic pattern, congresswoman, where parties are allowed to just ignore, decide, side-step a nomination of a sitting president if it's a president that they don't like, don't agree with, or not of their party? what is the historic precedent here? and in light of that, how do you and other members of congress go forward on dealing with the nomination of donald trump without dealing with that? >> there's no precedent, reverend al. first of all, senator mitch mcconnell and the republicans in the senate, they really stole the seat. it's a stolen seat. and ...