Page 4 - Smallc Conservative News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Supreme court decision. it was a stunning decision, right? all the liberals voted for the gore side. all the conservatives voted for the bush side. george w. bush became president. the court was so self-conscious about the spur riness that the ruling said it could not be cited in future cases. it was not precedent. in other words, we're not making law here, we just want george w. bush to be president, okay. the bush v gore five-four decision probably did mortal damage that capitol justices would act in small c conservative ways. they were happy to take radical, lead action to depart from legal...

Structured in the crazy way it was, was because they did not want to do anything that there was not precedent for. so to me it's in keeping with all the hysteria going back to death pan alelpanels, when in f small c conservative. it preserves the system we have, and there are tons of states that already implement exactly the directive that is now being hailed as some sort of unprecedented tyranny. >> with the example of depaul, for example, and with what you said looks like the bishops are picking a fight, this is not a substantive issue, with 28 states already having mandates like this, given...

All the liberals voted for the gore side. all the conserve atives voted for the bush side. george w. bush became president. the court was so self-conscious about the spur riness that the ruling said it could not be cited in future cases. it was not precedent. in other words, we're not making law here, we just want george w. bush to be president, okay. the bush v gore five-four decision probably did mortal damage that capitol justices would act in small c conservative ways. they were happy to take radical, lead action to depart from legal pres dent as long as it achieved a political aim that th...