Live Breaking News & Updates on Specific solutions
Stay updated with breaking news from Specific solutions. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
and longer-lasting relief than tylenol rapid release gels because advil targets pain at the source of inflammation. so for faster pain relief, advil the pain away. always dry scoop before you run. the hot dog diet got me shredded! the world is full of "health experts"... it's time we listen to science. one a day is formulated with b vitamins to help convert food into fuel. science that matters. huh. internet's out. wanna hear a fun fact? elbows are impossible to lick. i meant your own elbows. you don't settle for bad internet. that's why you have the xfinity 10g network, with ultra-low lag for better streaming. wish you would have been more specific about your elbow. only from xfinity.
elbows are impossible to lick. i meant your own elbows. you don't settle for bad internet. that's why you have the xfinity 10g network, with ultra-low lag for better streaming. wish you would have been more specific about your elbow. only from xfinity. good afternoon. i'm chris jansing reporting live from msnbc headquarters in new york city, and it is suddenly another wild day inside a manhattan courtroom. breaking news as we come on the air, former president trump addressing the court right now, part of the final chapter in the civil fraud trial that could bring down the empire that made
western russia and kazakhstan, and headed west around 5,000 years ago. the researchers say it helps explain why there are around twice as many cases of ms in northwestern europe, including the uk and scandinavia, compared to southern europe. researchers in cambridge, copenhagen and oxford extracted dna from the bones of 5,000 ancient humans and compared it with those of people alive today. these results really astounded us. to be able to tie the evolution of ms back to one specific, population 5,000 years ago, was a huge surprise. theoretically, we can use these approaches and use this data to investigate the origins of any disease with a genetic background. for example, schizophrenia, adhd. we look at where the diseases came from in the past and we hope to unlock some of their secrets. researchers also found that genes which may increase the risk of alzheimer's disease and type two
involved in this scandal? absolutely i would. . ., ., involved in this scandal? absolutely iwould. . ., ., , ., ~ i would. and one final question. are ou i would. and one final question. are you considering. _ i would. and one final question. are you considering, as _ i would. and one final question. are you considering, as sir— i would. and one final question. are you considering, as sir keir- i would. and one final question. are you considering, as sir keir starmer| you considering, as sir keir starmer called for earlier this week, taking away the power of the post office to pursue its own prosecutions? because as so many people have pointed out over so many years, it would appear to be a massive conflict of interest. to be a massive conflict of interest-— to be a massive conflict of interest. , , , ., ., , interest. yes, is the short answer. the ost interest. yes, is the short answer. the post office _ interest. yes, is the short answer. the post office hasn't _ interest. yes, is the short answer. the post office hasn't prosecuted i the post office hasn't prosecuted anybody since 2015, and i cannot see anybody since 2015, and i cannot see a situation where it would do that anyway. but the post office doesn't have a specific right of private prosecution. any person in the land and any company in the land has that right. what the justice secretary has said, they are questioning whether that is the right thing, certainly based upon what has happened near here, so there will be a body of work, and i'm sure the justice secretary will have more to say on this, on whether that general right of private prosecution should still stand in our society, and that is very significant question to be answered in that area.
dial it up, encourage the israelis to use less brute force, more specific, targeted special forces. think of it as a restat. now, we can argue back and forth as to whether they should have spun the dial faster and gotten f-16s to ukraine, but those are tactical decisions. the strategic way in which the administration has approached both ukraine and the middle east is balanced and sensible. >> and it continues putting pressure. you know, i love reading these stories about how russia is so powerful and russia has weathered the storm and russia is this, because the end of the year, there are a lot of end of the year stories. russia was, oh, they've handled the sanctions wonderfully. their economy is doing better than ever. they're this, they're that. you know, some of us that are older remember stories from '85,
doctrine of immunity in the first instance and that would be a natural thing for the court to do. >> in the specific -- >> yes, if the court holds presidential immunity, then it should be remanded to the district court and then go through the indictment and find factual findings to decide how it applies to the findings, and the court has the authority to do that. if there are no more questions? >> i have one more, and if there are the framework of nixon versus fitzgerald, we are to conduct a balancing act of the asserted immunity versus other public interests, and i see you as trying to represent a need for the executive to have this immunity to facility executive functions, the ability to act without hesitation, to be fearless, to make decisionmaking, to make
an understanding that we understand why they— an understanding that we understand why they feel so strongly about that event _ why they feel so strongly about that event and _ why they feel so strongly about that event and trying to put ourselves in their shoes — event and trying to put ourselves in their shoes i think it's really important. their shoes i think it's really important-— their shoes i think it's really imortant. . , . . , important. can i 'ust ask a number of ruick important. can i 'ust ask a number of quick factual— important. can ijust ask a number of quick factual questions. - important. can ijust ask a number of quick factual questions. how i important. can i just ask a number i of quick factual questions. how many uk citizens remain in gaza, and in particular in the north of gaza? in terms of the number of citizens in gaza, _ terms of the number of citizens in gaza, i_ terms of the number of citizens in gaza, i am — terms of the number of citizens in gaza, i am aware we have got a lot out and _ gaza, i am aware we have got a lot out and the — gaza, i am aware we have got a lot out and the israeli, egyptian and authorities within gaza have been helpful— authorities within gaza have been helpful in— authorities within gaza have been helpful in doing that. can authorities within gaza have been helpful in doing that.— helpful in doing that. can you be secific? helpful in doing that. can you be specific? i _ helpful in doing that. can you be specific? i know _ helpful in doing that. can you be specific? i know there _ helpful in doing that. can you be specific? i know there are - helpful in doing that. can you be specific? i know there are two i specific? i know there are two who want to get — specific? i know there are two who want to get out — specific? i know there are two who want to get out who _ specific? i know there are two who want to get out who don't - specific? i know there are two who want to get out who don't have i specific? i know there are two who | want to get out who don't have any security— want to get out who don't have any security clearance problems but you have not— security clearance problems but you have not yet got out. but i do not have _ have not yet got out. but i do not have but— have not yet got out. but i do not have but philip is going to find billy— have but philip is going to find billy number, i think there are still quite _ billy number, i think there are still quite a number of british nationals— still quite a number of british nationals or dual nationals who are in gaza _ nationals or dual nationals who are in gaza but— nationals or dual nationals who are in gaza but you haven't asked to leave _ in gaza but you haven't asked to leave. ~ ., i. . in gaza but you haven't asked to leave. ~ ., . , ., leave. we cannot give you a precise number.
left outside the schemes —— anybody left outside the schemes. he mentioned fujitsu and i concur with his points. anybody shown to be responsible for this scandal should be held accountable, including making any payments into the taxpayers fund for that. in terms of the honour system, i accept what he says. as i've said before on a number of occasions. as far as i'm concerned there is no reason anybody, i speak as a former ceo, and this is not for any specific that happened, and the williams inquiry is there to identify responsibility, but as a ceo who is overseeing the post office during a critical time, where things went so badly wrong, i think the former ceo myself, i would say it would be perfectly reasonable to ask somebody to voluntarily hang back and honours in that specific honour, but that is a matterfor the person concerned of course. a matter for the person concerned of
rachel: this is my, this is not said right. i was a lot more specific. my point is i want to get fit both body and soul. will: that's right here. rachel: i know. body and soul, so, yeah, i'm trying to prioritize my prayer life. and regarding be more fit and healthy, i want to get up early to work out. i'm going to say it, e failed this week. but i did work out. i just didn't do it at that time of day which i think would have been better. i'm also cutting down processed foods and my accountability partner is rick. rick and i both do peloton, and, yes, we've been texting each other. [laughter] rick: listen, here's the deal, this makes it sound like i have no discipline. [laughter] there were more words that could be attached to this. pete: how old are you? if you're developing discipline right now? rachel: never too late to start. rick: this is a far more
enemy. the issue is that there are so many multi faceted, and your personal relationship. so many relationships between different groups. let's go back to rory. that's why it was so important that israel took him out as based on his ability to do peacemaking and that type of interconnected, i would say, treaty, or allied with other groups outside of his specific religion, outside of his specific political stance. you have this axis of individuals who are always looking at israel as their enemy, and their ability to actually attack them. the issue you have is that we saw soleimani staff, there really was no reaction from iran that happened. i don't see a massive specific reaction based on this assassination. my response is this is a small, legal most slow escalation to where there could be an explosion. this actual assassination could make this into a bit of a tinderbox. it could expand the regional conflict. then what happens to the united states? how do we make a decision what we're going to do with iran,