Page 18 - Stake Holders News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The united states, obviously the conditions may really be a non starter. that's not even taking into account you cannot verify north korea has gotten rid of all of the nuclear weapons. they simply don't know where the weapons and materials are hidden. optics are huge here. that is why they are having a hard time, united states and north korea, coming to terms to have the monumental discussions. some locations are considered possible at this point. these are neutral locations here in asia. singapore, thailand, vietnam. in europe, sweden, switzerland or other areas with ties to the country. coun...

Switzerland. traveling a long distance to be a challenge for kim jong un. he could travel by train if possible. there are some locations ruled out because they are the capitals of the stake holders and they feel that would not work. washington, d.c., pyongyang, seoul, beijing. donald trump is not interested in the demilitarized zone. kim jong un not interested in an aircraft carrier off the korean peninsula. they need to discuss the date and what the denuclearization would mean. they want american forces off the korean peninsula. the potential normal saizing of relations and the nuclear

Secretary of state rex tillerson later this week. what this adds up to is the very beginning stages of laying the ground work for the historic meeting with president trump and kim jong un if it goes forward. it may be the united states and north korea and perhaps south korea in the room. there are a lot of stake holders here. key allies want to make sure the message is being heard and the u.s. is bringing thoughts and concerns to the table. here in china, that is the same feeling. all of the different stake holders who want to see lasting peace on the korean peninsula are doing what they want ...

Review of possible tariffs on steel that's not going to be done for another two weeks. this came out of absolutely nowhere. >> so there's a sort of substance and a process question. put it to the side. we debated this in a fascinating debate with leo and the steel workers and stephanie, but process-wise, like, this is really far a field of how something like this would normally work, right? >> well, absolutely. i mean, you would consider a policy change like this very judiciously and engage all sorts of stake holders in the government and outside of the government. it would take time. you woul...

>> so there's a sort of substance and a process question. put substance to the side. we debated this in a fascinating debate with leo and the steel workers and stephanie, but process-wise, like, this is really far a field of how something like this would normally work, right? >> well, absolutely. i mean, you would consider a policy change like this very judiciously and engage all sorts of stake holders in the government and outside of the government. it would take time. you would have a plan to roll it out. there would be an engagement period, even before you did that with the public likely bu...