Page 27 - Starr Report News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

I think if this is handled incorrectly it will reelect trump. that's what i think. republicans tonight including jim jordan, who i spoke to a few moments ago, think even more trump leaning democrats will agree with that sentiment and vote against articles because jerry nadleril today opened the door to drafting a least one article of impeachment based on the mueller report. that article would be based on obstruction of justice charges that were never proven. remember, mueller decided not to make a recommendation one way or another. he also raised questions about the legitimacy of the probe by ...

Opened the inquiry into president trump and if you count from the date the starr report was delivered to congress, it was 101 days. and of course, trump and republicans argue that democrats have been pursuing impeachment since the day trump was inaugurated. in that sense, the inauguration has been going on 1048 days. as for johnson, it was longer only if you count previous attempts to impeach him on other charges. the house voted to impeach him for violating the tenure of office act, just three days after the specific article, nine days after it. as they did in the intelligence committee, th...

Let me explain one thing in my view of how this has gone. the house judiciary committee can do real work at this point. there's an opportunity to clarify the nature of this process. yes, the house impeachment committee -- sorry, the house intelligence committee did do an investigation, but the impeachment inquiry is continuing under the judiciary committee, as has been the case historically. they can call more witnesses. this is an opportunity for the president to get more witnesses. if he's really concerned about an allegation of abuse of power he should be defending himself. i don't think it...

Official impeachment proceeding. good luck on the hearsay, he said, she said, and turn it into evidence. the one witness that can actually testify without offering opinion or hearsay that one guy, sondland on what that presidentd actually said. he is on record saying i heard the president say, what do you want for ukraine? i want nothing. no quid pro quo. that is not going to work out well in the senate when the rules of evidence, the federal rules of evidence are applied. of course, nadler will try his best in the witch trial, the coupst attempt will continue. remember 1998, this is the same ...

Official impeachment hearing. good luck on the hearsay he said, she said, and turn it into evidence. the one witness kept that can actually testify without offering opinion or hearsay, that one guy, sondland on what that president actually said. he is on record saying i heard the president say, what do you want for ukraine? i want nothing. no quid pro quo. that is not going to work out well in the senate when the rules of evidence, the federal rules of evidence are applied. of course nadler will try his best in the witch trial, the coup attempt will continue paired remember 1998, this is the s...