Page 6 - Strunk White News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Between the words. thank you for pointing it out, mr. strunk & white. what i'm saying is this is one tweet that is one among many that has shown a clear intention by this president to want the probe ended. and when you look at the tweets as a suggestion of a state of mind of his intentions and you put it into context with the things that he has done, is it any surprise that the mueller investigators want to talk to the president about obstruction of justice? >> i'm not surprised at all. i also won't be surprised if they'll find no proof of obstruction in his tweets just like they've found zero...

Matter. that's why when the president used the word should instead of the word must i think anybody examining his tweets for evidence of obstruction will have just as much luck as they are having trying to find collusion on the campaign. it's not there. it's the president's opinion. he doesn't suspend his first amendment rights when he takes the oath of office. >> but it is different when he says something like that than if you or i do. would you agree with that? >> no, the word should has a meaning. for the president or for you, chris. it's should, not must. >> i understand the difference bet...