Page 30 - Sub Postmaster News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

At the house accusing me. mr speaker, this is one of the greatest — mr speaker, this is one of the greatest miscarriages ofjustice in our nation's history. the prime minister's now announced a new law that will overturn all remaining convictions, and the 555 postmasters who took the post office to the high court in 2019, and won, will get an upfront payment of £75,000. they have lost everything. they've lost houses, livelihoods, shops, businesses. you know, it's — to think that £75,000 is actually enough, to an average member of the public, they would think that's a lot of money. but act...

As behaving like mafia gangsters during the time of the wrongful prosecutions, something steven bradshaw denied being the case. but in recent days we have spoken to several sub—postmaster who have spoken about a bullying culture, where secrets were being kept. in one keyjudgement of the 2019 high court case against the post office it was stated... further more, last may, the mp alistair carmichael said at a westminster hall debate on the scandal... the post office told us in 2021 it changed its governance structure, appointing two serving postmasters to the board to rebuild trust

Of the substance of the questions. essentially, ultimately, a notice of additional evidence was served on the 15 february 2013 and that was referred to in a letter from mr smith to the defence saying, we enclose typical copies of a notice of evidence, the statement of stephen bradshaw. mr patel was a sub—postmaster who came after mr ishaq. sub-postmaster who came after mr ishat. . sub-postmaster who came after mr ishaq-- you _ sub—postmaster who came after mr ishaq. yes. you said that statement had been ishaq. 123 you said that statement had been taken from both suppose masters and the oth...

Evidence, i thought, didn't pay any attention to evidence, ithought, it didn't pay any attention to evidence, i thought, it decided the fact and it wrote the rules and opposed the sub—postmasters. breathe? opposed the sub-postmasters. why? mone . opposed the sub-postmasters. why? money- they — opposed the sub-postmasters. why? money. they kneed _ opposed the sub-postmasters. why? money. they kneed to _ opposed the sub—postmasters. why? money. they kneed to keep horizon going, they needed to protect the reputation of the post office. they thought they were a national institution, they tho...

Such as _ having submitted a witness statement such as this_ having submitted a witness statement such as this in— having submitted a witness statement such as this in criminal _ such as this in criminal proceedings? - such as this in criminal proceedings?— such as this in criminal ”roceedins? ~ , �* , proceedings? with hindsight it's re . rettable proceedings? with hindsight it's regrettable that _ proceedings? with hindsight it's regrettable that statement - proceedings? with hindsight it'sj regrettable that statement went through as though it is my words which is not correct. it thr...