Page 3 - Surprise Statement News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Conclusion. the opinion says you cannot indict a president while he's in office, but he could have reached a decision as to whether it was criminal activity. the fact is bob did not make a decision that there was a crime. he didn't get into the analysis at all. part of the reason for that was his judgment about the olc opinion coupled with other things. he just didn't think it was proper exercise of his authority. so totally different issue, and that's why -- that's why both of us feel that this idea that there's been discrepancy over the olc opinion is simply wrong. >> that is what robert mue...

He is talking about spying. he is talking about people -- may have not committed treason in the legal sense. maybe they thought they were doing the right thing. he has -- before he's collected a set of facts cast doubt on this process that mueller said yesterday was done in a fair way with integrity. he is absolutely playing a political game. he is not protecting the department of justice. he's not protecting bob mueller. he's not backing him up. and i think it's astounding to see him on a press tour that continued from alaska because of bob mueller's surprise statement. he wanted to get on to...

Continued from alaska because of bob mueller's surprise statement. he wanted to get on top of it the day after and contradict him and say i think he could have made a call on obstruction when he knows what the special counsel said yesterday was the entire frame of the olc guidelines, is you don't taint a president with a charge or even -- there is no fairness when he can't defend himself. the entire criminal justice system is separate. it's only remedied in the congress and can't even begin. mueller basically could have never said i do think he's guilty of obstruction but maybe we won't charge...

I'll pass. thanks to robert mueller's surprise statement the number of democrats calling for impeaching proceedings has jumped to ten but one democratic candidate, senator michael bennett of colorado, told me during a cnn town ham last night he's not jumping on the impeachment train arguing it would only help donald trump. >> it is very important that we take a page out of history and do what they did with watergate which was to make sure the

Be investigated. but he's intentionally using provocative language to produce a political ramification that pleases the president and casts aspersions on the investigators, including mr. mueller, with whom he went on the air with cbs precisely to contradict the day following mueller's public statement. he is talking about spying. he is taulking about people -- may have not committed treason in the legal sense. maybe they thought they were doing the right thing. he has -- before he's collected a set of facts cast doubt on this process that mueller said yesterday was done in a fair way with inte...