Page 7 - Terrorism Operations News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

We got rid of all of them. excuse me, the translators we didn't get out. among other people in annc, important position, a designated global terrorist by washington who we have on a wanted list for $10 million. we couldn't get a glossy head shot from so we were forced to use the wanted photo we had up. how's that for inclusive? >> it is absolutely ridiculous and that speaks of the relationship we've had with pakistan. once again, when we negotiate from a position of weakness, that only lines the pockets of corrupt governments and lobbyists in washington, d.c. people can hide out in the pakista...

Troops in afghanistan. we have to protect our embassy, we have a counterterrorism platform that's useful in pakistan. et cetera. so obama didn't go down that road. and, in fact, trump is -- you know, if the reports are correct, we're going down to 7,000, that's not a particularly large force, obviously, but enough to protect the embassy. enough to carry out some kind of terrorism operations. and it is his purgative as commander in chief to do this. >> you're a former intelligence official, operative, whatever you want to call it. it's probably fair to say that even if u.s. troops will not be i...

State sponsor of terrorism with all the terrorist groups that cause this problem across the middle east and abroad so when you give iran access to billions of dollars you are funding their terrorism operations so when donald trump looks at the iran deal, has to announce whether to certify compliance, he is going to look at it support for terrorism. billions of dollars, allies get billions of dollars to support groups like hezbollah which endanger americans. >> even the obama administration admit that this happens. way it was, do you think donald trump does need to decertify it? >> the idea fro...

Requirement that nato agreed to some years ago, long before the president trump presidency, what is going to happen? is there going to be some shake in that u.s. commitment? is there a suggestion that nato becomes a pay for play kind of operation? i don't think there is at this point. i think that the secretary general made what is perhaps the key point. this whole debate about nato spending has in fact been going on for years. the debate about nato getting into terrorism operations, terrorism analysis, has been going on for years. none of this is new. nato inside the alliance has been working...

Particularly in syria. what do do you mean buy that in. >> the turkish government turned blind eye to extremist using turkey to wage war. they seem to be paying a price for this policy. they are paying a price they have invade syria and roll up islamic state in northern syria as a result the islamic state is responding to that invasion. it is this policy about extremism during the early part of the conflict in syria, the turkish presence, and it is the proximity and undertake this types of terrorism operations. >> i know you spend years